Οδοιπορικό στην Περσία του Ιμάμη – του Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτη
Το άρθρο αυτό δημοσιεύθηκε για πρώτη φορά στο περιοδικό Ανεξήγητο (Μάρτης 1986, σελ. 116-127). Για πρώτη φορά μεταφέρθηκε στο Ιντερνέτ από το σήμερα πλέον απενεργοποιημένο σάιτ technova: http://www.technova.gr/technova/index.php/2012-06-21-03-15-38/afieroma/1927-odoiporiko-stin-persia-tou-imam την Τετάρτη 19 Αυγούστου 2015. Ο φίλος κ. Νίκος Μπαϋρακτάρης αντέγραψε το κείμενο και με άφθονο φωτογραφικό, το οποίο συνέλεξε από το Ιντερνέτ, το ανέβασε ως βίντεο (σε δύο τμήματα) στο σήμερα απενεργοποιημένο ΥΤ κανάλι του. Η μουσική υπόκρουση ήταν δικής μου επιλογής. Χάρη στο υλικό που είχε ο κ. Μπαϋρακτάρης ετοιμάσει, ανέβασα το άρθρο σε δύο μορφές (σε Word doc η πρώτη και σε PowerPoint η δεύτερη) εδώ:
και
Τα βίντεο, τα οποία ετοίμασε ο κ. Μπαϋρακτάρης, μπορείτε να βρείτε εδώ:’
{Μουσική / Music accompaniment: Classical music from Iran – Great masters of the setar – Hossein Alizadeh (حسین علیزاده) 00:00 Mahtab 16:17 Avaz-e Abouata Masnavi} και
{Μουσική / Music accompaniment: Shahram Nazeri – Mystified (Sufi Music of Iran) 00:00 – Jewel of Love 10:09 – Desire}
Μπορείτε επίσης να τα βρείτε αντιστοίχως και εδώ:
Путеводитель по Ирану Имама / Itinerary in Imam’s Persia / Οδοιπορικό στην Περσία του Ιμάμη – του Μ. Σ. Μεγαλομμάτη https://ok.ru/video/333170084440
και
Путеводитель по Ирану Имама II / Itinerary in Imam’s Persia II / Οδοιπορικό στην Περσία του Ιμάμη II – του Μ. Σ. Μεγαλομμάτη https://ok.ru/video/333172181592
Σε αυτή την ηλεκτρονική αναδημοσίευση παρουσιάζονται για πρώτη φορά online οι ίδιες οι σελίδες του περιοδικού, αν και ασπρόμαυρες.
============
Κατεβάστε το άρθρο σε PDF:
Unknown Photographer - Blue Mosque in Mazar-i-Sharif, Afghanistan Photography
The Alexander Romance (a series of fictional stories about Alexander the Great) doesn’t just celebrate Alexander’s virility and skill in warfare; it also portrays him as insatiably curious about the world. In one story, Alexander descends deep under the sea in a primitive diving bell. He brought with him a rooster (to help him keep time by crowing), a dog, and a cat.
We have a version of the story from the Mughal Empire in the late 1500s:
And another from Germany in the 1400s:
{WHF} {Ko-Fi} {Medium}
A Roman shrine to the god Mithras (Mithraeum), ca. A.D. 240, from Dura-Europos (Syria).
The cult of Mithras first became evident in Rome towards the late 1st century AD. Having originated in Persia, during the next two centuries, it spread to the frontiers of the Western empire. It is referred to as a Roman “mystery” cult, for an initiation ceremony was required in joining, and the members kept the activities and liturgy of the cult strictly secret. Due to the highly secretive nature of the cult, our evidence for it is essentially entirely archaeological. Here we have a rare of example of a Mithraeum from Dura-Europos, which appears to be originally set in private house -a rare case indeed. The Yale University Art Gallery give the following description:
A shrine to the god Mithras, the Mithraeum at Dura-Europos was commissioned A.D. 168/69 by Palmyrene archers serving in the Roman army. It was renovated and enlarged in A.D. 209/11. The reconstruction on view here represents the third and final phase, dating to around A.D. 240. Unlike most Mithraea, which were underground to commemorate the god’s birth in a cave, the Dura Mithraeum was built into a private house.
The cult of Mithras attained popularity in the Roman period among soldiers and merchants. Restricted to men, it was a mystery religion thought to include initiation, ritual banquets, and the promise of salvation after death. The primary cult image was the tauroctony, or Mithras slaying the Cosmic Bull, often paired with an image of Mithras banqueting with Sol, god of the sun (as seen in the painting at left). Other common images included events from the life of Mithras and zodiac signs. While the subjects depicted in most Mithraea are similar, style and composition vary. The Dura Mithraeum contained two tauroctony reliefs, one above the other. The side walls showed Mithras as a mounted archer in a presentation that would have resonated with the Palmyrene archers who founded the shrine. (Yale)
Courtesy of & can be viewed at the Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven, CT. Via their online collections: 1935.100.
The Egyptians almost never depicted illness. This instance is one of the exceptions. One of the man’s legs is withered and the foot only supports itself on the toes. It is the opinion of quite a number of doctors that these deformities are due to polio. This may be the world’s oldest representation of that disease.
New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty, ca. 1401-1363 BC. Now in the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek. Copenhagen. ÆIN 134
How God created Man and men in Sumer, Akkad and Egypt fashioned the mankind by creating gods
Emperor Ashurnasirpal II (883-859 BCE) appears twice, dressed in ritual robes and holding the mace symbolizing authority; he makes a gesture of worship to Ashur depicted in a winged disc. In front of him there is the Sacred Tree of Life. Excavated by: Sir Austen Henry Layard (May 1846) in the North West Palace of Kalhu (today's Nimrud), North Iraq (then Ottoman Empire)
The present text is not a concise essay; it does not therefore cover all the topics related to the series of historical developments herein mentioned. Being part of a long exchange of emails with a friend, it merely offers readers the chance to become better acquainted with historic events that are mentioned in almost all sacred texts but comprehended poorly and confusingly. A constant but truly disastrous human mistake is the projection of assumptions, conventional thoughts, and situations from our environment onto past circumstances that were however very different. In this regard, the present text will be very helpful as it will instigate the conscious reader into active reconsidering and systematic reassessing several hitherto unquestioned conclusions that are certainly wrong.
Contents
Introduction
I. Ra, Isis and Kabbalah
II. Messiah-Christ-Mahdi: a pre-Biblical, eschatological concept
III. The Tree of Life, its loss, and its eschatological recovery
IV. Two kinds of priesthood for the descendants of Noah and a separate, third, priesthood for the incestuous remnants of sinful descendants of Adam
V. Creation, spirituality, the loss thereof (as consequence of successive falls), and its eschatological recovery
VI. Spirituality from the Flood to the Late Antiquity
VII. Spirituality, the five elements, and the wrong sources of modern Western mystics
Introduction
Many people today confuse the human soul with the mind, the heart, and the solar plexus that are the pillars on which the human character is founded, built, gradually developed and ultimately formed; that is wrong. The human character is definitely not the human soul. Only few days after the death, the body and the character start getting disintegrated, whereas the soul is immortal. As part of the spiritual universe, the human soul is a particular spiritual entity, which is ascribed to a nascent body (embryo) at the very moment of its birth.
Due to conscious (and at times unconscious) synergy between the soul and the body, a human can perform 'miracles'. All those 'miracles', like every similar act that was performed by Jesus and described in Gospels, were not truly speaking miracles but the result of spiritual potency, i.e. spiritual-material (bodily) synergy.
In fact, the narratives are true, but miracles do not exist. Simply, humans have been first fooled about the spiritual universe, which is also inside each being, because we all have souls and everything created within the material universe corresponds to its spiritual hypostasis (or soul); and at a second (and worst) level, humans have been deceived and dissociated from their souls, which in turn results in lack of spiritual potency and in the subsequent formation of the belief in 'miracles'. I will now offer few practical examples of spiritual potency, so that no one has any doubt about my approach to the topic:
A man with spiritual potency is able not to allow a bullet shot at him to penetrate his body and kill him. Back in the 1930s, it was reported that the great Hindu sage and mystic Mahatma Gandhi used to just watch English military airplanes (targeting the people of a city that had revolted against the English rule) and make it sure that the bombs dropped fell elsewhere without killing anyone.
A man with spiritual potency is able to physically walk on the sea or lake water or in the air, to be corporeally present somewhere without being seen by those who are present there, to instantly transfer himself bodily to a remote location, to literarily walk nearby wild beasts without being attacked or threatened by them, as well as to naturally stay in the depths of the oceans and deep inside the Earth without any difficulty, consequence or side-effect.
Furthermore, a man with spiritual potency is able to hide objects or physically transfer them to remote locations, make them speak, and instantly change their shape, to interact (or 'speak') with many spiritual beings, souls, spirits, intelligences and hierarchies, to bodily move back in time and invisibly attend a well-known or an unknown historical scene (meeting, conference, battle, liturgy or other event); and so on.
--------------------- Response to a friend -------------------------
My dear friend,
Thank you for the attachments, your continuous interest, your comprehensive response, and the critical points of discussion that you raise!
Recently, I wrote extensive letters to you because I wanted you to have an accurate understanding of my encounter with the spiritual universe, and of my explorations, ruminations and polarizations in view of a methodically ameliorated comprehension of the interaction between the spiritual and the material halves of all humans. For me, it is this interaction that generated History. That's why I don't believe that what people call "History" has been only the outcome of material components and constituents. I therefore try to always highlight the spiritual dimensions of the developments that took place on Earth. Consequently, it is only normal that with great joy I read your sentence "As I see you have already the basis for spiritual science, it would be a pleasure for me to give you a few hints".
I. Ra, Isis and Kabbalah
Speaking about Kabbalah, you refer to the "the magic of the word"; to me, this fact became first understood through Ancient Egyptian sacred texts as per which Isis is the only to know the true name of Ra. I interpret this narrative as revelatory that only the spiritual ancestors of the Ancient Freemasons and Rosicrucians (i.e. Isis) had this knowledge, whereas the spiritual ancestors of the Jesuits (Nephthys) did not. I understand the beginning of the Gospel by John; in fact, it is a Gnostic text. From this point to the Jesuit-promoted concept, heretic Russian Orthodox dogma, and Catholic infiltration attempt of Imiaslavie (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imiaslavie) the distance is small.
All the same, it is my conviction that, by using the term 'word" for the description of Kabbalah-related exercises and endeavors, people only get confused. I believe that the truly correct term should be "sound"; this is the correct meaning of all formulas collected and analyzed by Franz Bardon. Their spiritual value is effective when they are uttered / pronounced; not when they are merely evoked in the mind of a person!
And yes! I fully agree with what you say "The book by Franz Bardon about the Kabbalah is the only one on our globe teaching the spiritual practice of this science.".
II. Messiah-Christ-Mahdi: a pre-Biblical, eschatological concept
Following my historical researches on Jesus, which were spearheaded by my studies of Robert Ambelain's books, I realized that Jesus was not the Messiah or Christ whom the Ancient Hebrews were said to expect to come at the End of Time. But when I studied Assyriology and Egyptology, I realized (as early as 1980) that the Biblical and later the Christian and then Islamic concepts of Messiah-Christ-Mahdi are nothing more than adaptations and localizations of the Ancient Assyrian-Babylonian monotheistic concepts of Ninurta and Etana (two parallel perceptions of the concept of a Savior coming at the end of Times), and of the (equally monotheistic) Ancient Egyptian concept of Horus. Furthermore, several episodes of the Anatolian Hittite eschatological myth and sacred text 'Ullikummi' have been passed onto the Christian Book of the Revelation, whereas the Hittite Messiah Tasmisu managed to save the central city of the End Time days at the last moment, finally vanquishing Ullikummi, the monster that came out of the Sea (: the Antichrist).
That this approach to the Ancient Oriental civilizations is embarrassing to all, namely the Zionists, the Freemasons and the Jesuits, I can understand easily. The traditional method of academic interpretation renders all these eschatological texts mere myths that no specialist truly attempts to systematically interpret and analyze.
This situation was a constant parameter and a question that I repeatedly made to myself during my postgraduate and doctoral studies:
- Why do Biblical theologians, who study a Biblical text during the seminar (first discussing issues pertaining to the script, the language-lexicography, the grammar and the syntax), offer also a historico-religious interpretation of the text under study (of let's say Isaiah 53), whereas Orientalists teaching the Descent of Ishtar to the Nether world limit their courses only to the first section of analysis?
In any case, the fact that Jesus was not the Messiah-Christ is also confirmed by a simple fact: there cannot be a Messiah (or Savior) without the End of Time; and apparently, the time of the Roman Emperor Tiberius was not the End of Time – which means that no Messiah appeared then.
III. The Tree of Life, its loss, and its eschatological recovery
I can perhaps accept your statement ("In Kabbalah the hierarchy is called 'Tree of Life'.") but only as a metaphor. It is my absolute conviction that the Tree of Life is a real, material and spiritual, Tree, which was at the epicenter of the original Paradise. By preferring the Tree of Knowledge to the Tree of Life, Adapa (Adam in Hebrew) only condemned his posterity to 'fall'. By so doing, he provoked a series of other falls, which will be outmaneuvered and canceled only at the End of Time, following many unprecedented destructions and ruinations. Actually, this is the nucleus of every known eschatological concept and soteriological dogma from the times of the Sumerians, the Akkadians-Assyrians-Babylonians, the Egyptians and the Hittites down to our days. Further 'falls' occurred to Mankind, more paragraphs were added to the apocalyptic myths and the soteriological texts.
Many people understand that "as above so below", but few people realize that "as before so after". There is no such thing as "doomsday"; it is not an independent event or a terminal development; those who believe such nonsense are either fools or liars. A rather early phase of the End Times may eventually be described as "doomsday", but this is only the gate to the original Paradise re-established. That is why Fathers of the Christian Church and Christian theologians (thinking that he was the Messiah) named Jesus "New (or Last) Adam" (1 Corinthians 15:45-58). The final Savior will be as spiritually powerful as Adam before the original sin (which caused the fall).
Every well-founded spiritual quest is therefore the search for the Tree of Life; I surely understand very well why so many mystics in so many, different, socio-cultural environments were so obstinately determined not to allow thoughts in their minds. This is a paramount effort of self-purification. Thoughts are useless forms of self-destruction. Adam, before his sin, did not 'think'; he did not need to. Angels do not think; souls, spirits, spiritual intelligences, and other hierarchies of the non-material universe do not think. Will (voluntas) is unrelated to thinking.
Cogito ergo non sum: this truth demonstrates the rotten foundations of the Western world. And you, my dear friend, as a consistent and experienced mystic, certainly know very well that Siegfried's death in Götterdämmerung is only the result of 'thinking' (and betrayal). But this was already very well known to the Ancient Mesopotamians, who used to identify 'thinking' as a parameter of the perilous domain of Enlil (: Air) and, to avert all troubles, recognized 'wisdom' as possible without thinking and as a dimension of the realm of Ea (: Soft Waters).
And by eliminating all thoughts and evacuating their subconscious, the Assyrian emperors and high priests were able to bring the Tree of Life back to Nineveh. They even were spiritually conscious and empowered to stipulate that the Tree of Life was one and three at the same time, as it was reflected at the center of the City of the Nether World and at the Gates of the Firmament.
I believe that real spiritual potency combined with transcendental moral (which is inherent to all created beings) enables humans to rise to the level of sanctity; then, the materialization (: the material appearance) of the 'Sole Tree' (: Tree of Life) in a spot, which is part of the -secret and unknown to most- holy land, can take place. But this is not up to anyone. When it happens, it will have worldwide impact and it will bring forth incalculable changes, totally changing everything in the everyday life of all the people. This is what happened in Nineveh in the 9th-8th c. BCE and for this development to be completed Prophet Jonah was dispatched there, having the absolute success that he had and contributing to the subsequent events, which irrevocably linked Assyria to the End Times. For this reason Jesus and the Quran referred to the Men of Nineveh as returning at the End Times, and to the conclusive role that they will play in rejecting and terminating "this generation" (: the prevailing system before the eschatological termin).
IV. Two kinds of priesthood for the descendants of Noah and a separate, third, priesthood for the incestuous remnants of sinful descendants of Adam
I am glad to know that you agree with the concept of the "two kinds of priesthood" which is a constituent element of my approach to World History and a constant point of reference in many of my articles. Identifying the "good ones" with Isis (namely the spiritual ancestors of pre-modern Freemasonry) and the "evil ones" with Nephthys (i.e. the predecessors of the modern Jesuits), I exclude Zionism from both.
Actually, I don’t believe that Zionism has anything to do with historical Judaism and the descendants of the Hasmonean Jews. In fact, Zionists hijacked Judaism, stripping (Sephardic, Romaniote, Mizrahi and Yemenite) Jews of all of their Biblical and eschatological visions and expectations, and making them theirs. Actually, Zionism is the filthy product of a bastard population which does not originate from Noah but from Adam, but has been contaminated with the seed of one generation of Giants.
Early known as the (antediluvian) Guti, they infiltrated among the early Turanian Kassites whom they helped (after the Hittite sack of Babylon - 1596 BCE) by means of treachery and black magic to invade Babylon and establish a counterfeit and devilish dynasty in Mesopotamia. After Elam overthrew the Kassites and the Assyrians invaded and annexed Babylon, the Kassites formed a powerful polytheistic and idolatrous clique of priests who fueled anti-Assyrian paroxysm and survived all Assyrian invasions.
They induced Nebuchadnezzar to invade the tiny, marginal and unimportant Judah enclave in order to deliberately transport the totality of the Jewish population to Babylonia and thus expose them to efficient Kassite Zionist infiltration. By nominally accepting 7th c. BCE Judaism as religion and by arranging intermarriages, the Kassite Zionists (later known as Gog and Magog and more recently identified as Khazars) intended to substitute themselves to the Jews, rewrite and readjust the Bible at will, thus removing and adding paragraphs and sentences; they were the moving force behind the composition of Talmud to which not one pre-Exilic layman, priest, king or prophet would have ever ascribed himself.
V. Creation, spirituality, the loss thereof (as consequence of successive falls), and its eschatological recovery
Yes, I accept everything that you say in your paragraph about Christian Rosenkreuz and the earlier stages of spiritual initiation, but I find it very brief as diagram and very modest as description particularly if we take it into account, when exploring the spiritual potency which existed as inherent to all humans but later vanished from among the average people. That is why I intend now to present to you for the first time my complete perception and interpretation of the topic, namely the presence or absence of spiritual potency among humans and the true destination of Life and Creation. This is going to be the main part of my present response.
The present average human was not created by God; his condition is the result of many, successive falls, which correspond to different sins (in terms of thoughts, sentiments, desires, words and deeds) that contravened the Divine Order of Creation which is inherent to any being and which is called 'Moral' within religious context. So, to be accurate, today's man is the product of the consequences of earlier generations that go back to Adapa (Adam), the early Man whom God created.
And while all parts of the Creation have their spiritual counterparts (and this renders the division of the modern discipline of Chemistry into Organic and Inorganic a vicious and deliberate trickery), Adam was an outstanding marvel as he was able to perform hitherto unfathomable 'miracles', which are not at all extraordinary or unbelievable (as today's fallen, trivial, miserable, idiotic and pathetic humans think), but simply ordinary, regular deeds that may be absolutely necessary for the purpose of the Creation.
Naming animals, reptiles and birds (but not the fish) is an activity reported as part of the Creation, because by designating the name of these creatures, in fact Adam attributed to them their functions and traits as if he had been in a way their creator.
However, a considerable part of this spiritual potency was lost due to the early sin, which clearly involved thought, calculation, interest, and exposure to desire and lust. This is not only a simple matter of narrative, but also a clear indication of how the inherent (to all beings) code of the Creation functions. It is not God who punishes, but man who, by indulging himself into what he was not created for, gets exposed to the consequences of his 'impermissible' thoughts, sentiments, desires, words and deeds.
In fact, there is nothing 'impermissible' to humans, because Man was created free, but for everything there is an inevitable consequence. What the story of Adam and Eve reveals is that sex is evil, and therefore human reproduction as per the Order of the Creation was absolutely unrelated to the sexual intercourse, as this act has been viewed in the Late Antiquity and during the Christian, Islamic and Modern times.
All the same, the pictorial representation of the Ancient Egyptian concepts of fertility and reproduction lets us understand that the body members, which are used for reproduction, are the same, but their original functionality differed greatly from the paradisiac times to the post-paradisiac epochs. In this regard, it is essential to state that the act of reproduction was void of lust, because it was performed in total synergy between soul and body.
For this reason, according to the Ancient Egyptian Iwnw Heliopolitan dogma, when after the dismemberment of Osiris by Seth, Isis recollected the parts of the Human Well Being (: this is the real meaning of the Ancient Egypt name 'Wser', which was later distorted to 'Osiris' in Ancient Greek and Latin), she made a replica for the lost male part, which was "tossed into the river, and the lepidotus, the sea-bream, and the pike had fed upon it" (Plutarch's Moralia, De Iside et Osiride 18). Isis consecrated the phallus, but it is explicitly said that the phallus is only a simulacrum of the original male member.
The first fall must have had an enormous impact notably on the fauna; it would be absurd to think that God created wild animals. Simply, the successive falls of the Man affected them greatly; there are plenty of Biblical passages and eschatological literature as per which the original condition will be reestablished after the End Times (example: "The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together; and a little child shall lead them"; Isaiah 11, 6).
In spite of the loss of spiritual potency, the original humans were still extraordinarily formidable and dreadful to all animals; the evolutionist scheme as per which the early humanoids had to permanently fight hard for their survival is sheer nonsense and utter aberration. In fact, various absurd theories, inconsistent assumptions, and scientific frauds, such as Darwinism, Marxism-Leninism (historical materialism), evolutionism and several other absolutely preposterous philosophical systems were treacherously adopted by academic circles thus conditioning the direct and pertinent understanding of ancient sacred texts, other historical sources, and the archaeological record.
Despite the loss of spiritual potency, the early humans were still omnipotent beings that could carry out prodigious exploits and magnificent works; this was due to the fact that they were still able to master their own electromagnetic fluids far better than the Latvian-American mystic and scientist Edward Leedskalnin (1887-1951), who first quarried and sculpted, and then transported to another location (Homestead, Florida) more than 1100 short tons of limestone (1 short ton is 907 kg) completely alone with the use of modest tools and the help of a truck driver. Explaining how he was doing the monumental structure, he called upon the skills and the capacities of the early pyramid architects and builders.
Many people admire Leedskalnin's exploits, but unfortunately, few people manage to notice (let alone assess and evaluate) key points of his life example; even fewer are capable of making the equation. Abstinence and celibacy (or chastity), rigorousness and austerity were evident to all who met him. But this means exactly what I already stated for the original Man; he was apparently created to steer clear of thought, calculation, interest, desire and lust. And this is exactly what the life examples of the prophets, as well as the behavioral standards left by selected emperors, high priests, and mystics, demonstrate.
Consequently, it is safe to claim the following:
1- Lust triggered the fall, which brought about a significant loss of spiritual potency;
2- Loss of spiritual potency caused further lust and other sins (thus starting a vicious circle); and
3- Spiritual potency recovery is impossible without elimination of lust and other sins.
As a matter of fact, numerous conspiracy theories, earlier unheard fallacies, such as the assumption about the existence of the so-called 'Extraterrestrials', and many other fraudulent postulations started being propagated in the late 19th c.: this was due to the fact that people have been gradually approaching to the End Times, when the most complicated lies and the most absurd delusions will be propagated. These monstrously devilish attempts occurred because of the determination of the evil priesthoods, which rule today's world, to permanently keep all the humans captive of deceptions, which prevent them from liberating themselves from the compact falsehood in which they have been living.
For these counterfeit and blasphemous religious leaders, it is definitely essential to prevent humans from attempting to reestablish synergy of the body and the soul in themselves. So, you understand that almost all those, who speak today against the so-called New World Order and the established academic disciplines, are integral parts of the evil system, as long as they do not admonish all the humans to focus on abstinence, celibacy, and departure (lit. exodus) from today's Western societies, as well as to deploy an overwhelming effort in order to achieve spiritual consciousness. Deception, delusion and lie were the first acts of this demoniacal priesthood, and the same nature will characterize their last acts, when they will perish in the years of upheaval during the End Times.
All the same, in spite of the existence of masterful paragons of faith like Enoch (Idris), the original fall generated conditions of life in which humans started being prone to further sins. The quintessence of those transgressions were due to the slow formation of what people now call "ego", which grows fed on thoughts, calculations, interests, sentiments, and desires, thus dragging the spiritual-material individual far from the purpose of the Creation and the inherent code of the Creation. This nefarious situation proved to be extremely useful to some evil people.
It is in Mesopotamia around the middle of the 4th millennium BCE, when we first notice that within the same early urban center some edifices start becoming larger than the rest. There are only two per agglomeration: the palace and the temple. This rivalry, as it is documented first due to archaeological data and second thanks to the early historical sources (3250-2750 BCE), bears witness to the first tensions within the then united priesthood, enabling us to correctly interpret the rise of the polytheism as an heresy and an effort to personalize, depict and humanize the Divine.
In striking opposition to the early kings and the monotheistic priesthoods that were associated to them, the devious clergy, which supported the primary sacerdotal forerunners, intended to enslave the local population and by means of falsehood to render them dependent on intermediaries between the so-called 'gods' and the humans. This was the foremost postulation of the wicked priesthood: the humans alone cannot contact God. It goes without saying that this aberration is direct rejection of the Creation.
The malicious attempt of subordination and enslavement of the early humans to some supposedly necessary 'priests' is called 'religion'; it killed spirituality, limiting the humans to merely material functions and therefore bestializing them. The evil, absurd, and inhuman claim that Man necessitates an intermediary between him and God is the epitome of Satanism. From the deeds of those days to the final split of the early sacerdotal college in Sumer, several hundreds of years passed. Insane attempts and numerous trials of promiscuous intermarriages took place back at those days, and they left an impact on the local societies, as they were repeatedly mentioned in posterior historical sources; for example, the Assyrians, considering themselves as the only true humans (in Mesopotamia), namely the descendants of the Sumerians and the Akkadians, irrevocably denounced several unclean races, notably the Guti, the Elamites, and the Kassites, as abnormal and inhuman.
It was only normal that these calamitous developments totally dissociated humans from their souls and caused further detrimental loss of spiritual potency. The evil priesthood -of which the terminal continuity is represented today by Vatican and the Jesuits- wanted to also destroy the link between men and animals, which goes back to Adam. That is why they forced the fallen humans of the antediluvian world to kill animals in order to hypothetically obtain spiritual power by taking possession of their souls. This was a lie; it could never happen and it never happened. But due to this delusion, an unnecessary, yet enormous, bloodshed took place, plunging the disoriented and victimized human into grave immorality, polytheistic superstitions, exorbitant delusions, abject materialism, black magic (representation of animals that had to be sacrificed), and utter misery.
VI. Spirituality from the Flood to the Late Antiquity
The divine punishment and the dissolution of the early society were narrated in several sacred texts as the Flood; erroneous readings, naïve considerations, and superficial approaches to Assyrian-Babylonian and other, posterior, historical sources and divine literature led to tremendous misjudgment and protracted confusion as regards this disproportionate event and phenomenal circumstance, which left an irrevocable stamp on the History of Mankind. Actually, it is not for nothing that Jesus established a parallel between the days of Ut Napishtim (Noah / Nuh) and those of the End Times.
Gullible researchers and foolish scholars, who still accept the narrative, think that the Flood was due to intense and overwhelming rain; that's hilarious! Even if all the lands and seas, continents and oceans are covered by clouds and if it rains all over the surface of the Earth, it will be practically impossible for the level of water to rise by 200 or 300 m, let alone thousands of meters as various sacred texts stipulate.
The deliberate disregard for, if not concealment of, the Biblical text (Genesis 7, 11) only contributes to the cosmological and geological bewilderment of mankind; but the text is very accurate: "on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened" (Septuagint: τῇ ἡμέρᾳ ταύτῃ ἐῤῥάγησαν πᾶσαι αἱ πηγαὶ τῆς ἀβύσσου, καὶ οἱ καταῤῥάκται τοῦ οὐρανοῦ ἠνεῴχθησαν; Vulgata: rupti sunt omnes fontes abyssi magnae et cataractae caeli apertae sunt; Masoretic text: בַּיּ֣וֹם הַזֶּ֗ה נִבְקְעוּ֙ כׇּֽל־מַעְיְנֹת֙ תְּה֣וֹם רַבָּ֔ה וַאֲרֻבֹּ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם נִפְתָּֽחוּ׃). In fact, it was a stern and formidable development, which involved unprecedented fractures of the Earth's crust and the break (: opening) of the Firmament.
Many people fail to notice that the descriptions attested in sacred texts about the antediluvian world present a natural environment totally different from the one that we see today; even worse, they fail to understand that this contrast is actually true and that the Earth that God created was also very distinct in shape and contents from what surrounds us now. In other words, it is completely wrong to imagine or believe that God created deserts, steppes, savannahs, and swamps, and that the seas (salt waters) occupied a so vast surface as in the postdiluvian world. There too, the perfect world after the End Times, a topic that is the object of several soteriological narratives, presents considerable analogies with the original antediluvian environment, which is what God created.
In Ancient Mesopotamia, which is the cradle of World History, we find
a- 'prophetic' or 'apocalyptic' texts about the Flood (which were written before the event),
b- historical texts about the Flood (which were written after the event but detailed the downward spiral of circumstances that had occurred in the antediluvian society of Akkad, leading it to ultimate collapse and decomposition), and
c- mythological texts about the Flood (which were written later for spiritual, religious and educational purposes, therefore involving symbols, analogies, specific terms, and codified descriptions that became the foundations of the transcendental comprehension of the facts by later generations).
Although the cosmological-geological changes were unprecedented, the spiritual, socio-cultural, religious, and imperial transformations were apparently even more overwhelming. The polytheistic priesthood prevailed almost worldwide, forcing therefore the true believers (: the monotheistic sacerdotal colleges) to be organized in defensive mode in order to avoid infiltration. This is how what we call now 'societies of initiation' or 'spiritual orders' came to existence. It was apparently detrimental for the entire mankind, because due to this situation, spirituality depended almost exclusively on participation in some priesthood.
Societies, nations or countries with hierarchical priesthoods and spiritual orders are abnormal, inhuman, and impossible to maintain; that is why the present world order is inevitably perishable. There cannot be any hierarchy among humans, involving the absurd withholding of information, knowledge, wisdom, and spiritual potency. This is so, because if this condition had been tolerable, God would have not created one but many Adams – one per hierarchy level.
There cannot be secrecy among humans and there cannot be secluded groups with interests common only to them within a society; this is so because such conditions of life breach the divine commandment of fraternity. The structure of the postdiluvian world is therefore unsustainable, because it is morally indefensible. The only means that prevented its total collapse was the war; the conditions of sin, injustice and inequality -in and by themselves- bring forth the end. This is so because dissociation from one person's soul and formation of egoistic, egocentric and egotistic characters cause confusion, misjudgment, failure and putrefaction.
In the postdiluvian world, people could not reestablish spiritual-material synergy except by becoming members of a priestly college. Within such an environment, the incessant clash between the polytheistic and the monotheistic priesthoods took the form of invariably composing and decomposing myths, epics, and transcendental narratives, attributing different traits to the same god (thus disfiguring God), and elaborating dissimilar variants and opposite versions of sacred texts. There has never been a religion with an unaltered holy book.
Physically strong and spiritually dwarf, Gilgamesh was an anti-Akkadian king or, if you prefer, a counterfeit Sargon whom the polytheistic and idolatrous priesthood of the Neo-Sumerian times fashioned in order to divulge, and ensure the prevalence of, the concept of Papo-Caesarism. Projecting his past at will, they made of their creature a foremost king, a legendary hero, and a divine human with a material perspective and an anti-universal worldview.
Justifying the increasing urbanism of late 3rd millennium BCE Mesopotamia and the subsequent disconnection from nature, Gilgamesh became the object of many sacred texts and narratives which promoted the counterfeit and idolatrous notion of a city being the microcosm of the universe. Consequently, the original literature about Gilgamesh facilitated evil spiritual policies of the type 'urbi et orbi'. That is why in striking contrast to the genuine Akkadian imperial universalism (or ecumenism) of Sargon of Akkad, the religious-educational cycle of Gilgamesh attempted to foster an 'internationalism' based on the interconnection of urban centers, solid disrespect for the nature, deliberate promotion of ethnic amalgamation and acculturation, and lack of any temporal dimension.
Quite contrarily, the Akkadian (and later the Assyrian) imperial universalism was founded on the sanctity of various locations (geographical determinism), exemplary respect for the nature viewed as remnant of the original Paradise, singularity of the Chosen People, namely the Akkadians-Assyrians, uniqueness of the Emperor (King of the Universe / Caesaropapism) as the permanent embodiment of the Messiah (Ninurta or Etana: two monotheistic cycles of religious-eschatological Mesopotamian literature), adoration of God in front of the Tree of Life, and endless exaltation of the Sacred Moment (as identification element on the axis of Being and Becoming).
The interminable friendliness and rivalry between Gilgamesh and Enkidu, as an odd spiritual-literary pattern, reveals the morbidity of Gilgamesh as prototype; in fact, all the Biblical and Islamic prophets followed the example of Enkidu, the paramount non-urban human. The wretchedness of the evil model of Gilgamesh can be best understood when specifying that the Mesopotamian hero-king is none other than the Biblical-Islamic Nimrud (also spelled as Nimrod & Namrud), who forced Abram-Abraham-Ibrahim to exile.
But, when we comprehensively examine all the related literary excerpts, we are certainly able to conclude that no utterance surpasses the detrimental rejection of Gilgamesh by the real vanquisher of the Flood Atrahasis (Ut Napishtim/Noah-Nuh), who lived eternally in Dilmun, having preserved around him the likeness of the antediluvian world; the fact that Gilgamesh would never attain immortality heralded the inevitable termination of the system, which produced this monster.
The predilection for the imperial model and the rejection of the priestly model was not only a fervent choice of the Mesopotamian monotheists, but also an explicit statement made by the Biblical God: "the more priests there were, the more they sinned against me; they exchanged their glorious God for something disgraceful" (Hosea 4:7).
Maintaining the material yoke over the captives was a permanent concern for the sacerdotal colleges that propagated one delusion after the other; despite the fact that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was preserved as narrative in the Torah, a) the ritualistic use of sex, b) the extraction of energy from the human lasciviousness and debauchery, and c) the utilization of the material-spiritual potency of all the initiates for purposes of social-religious prevalence and material control remained a practice for all types of priesthood. The advanced decay and the loss of the original faith were the reasons for which the ancient religions were practically dissolved or could not have a serious impact anymore.
VII. Spirituality, the five elements, and the wrong sources of modern Western mystics
During the Late Antiquity, spirituality turned out to mean desecrated spiritual potency exerted by immoral mystics, Gnostics, and high priests who had to perform always more miracles in order to attract more followers. In this regard, Christianity was only a smart project of two colleges of Iranian and Egyptian priests settled in Rome. These Mithraists and the Memphists intended to extract the energy of their believers, i.e. fanaticized people whose total dedication was offered to narratives about Jesus rather than to Jesus' preaching itself. The rise of Roman Christianity was a disaster for the Gnostics and the earlier monotheistic priesthoods, whereas the rise of Constantinopolitan and Cappadocian Christianity, as an ingenious and impetuous reaction, consisted in stark rejection of the Roman fallacy.
The arrival of Islam, which in its original form was not another religion properly speaking, but a rejection of the heretical narratives about Jesus, a strong devotion to his preaching, and an effort to ascertain his faith, consisted in an effort to offer people another chance to reestablish synergy of the body and the soul in themselves after the examples of Moses, Elijah, Jonah, Jesus, Muhammad and Ali.
From the Brethren of Purity (إخوان الصفا /Ikhwan al-Ṣafa) to Muḥyiddin Ibn Arabi to Safi-ad-Din Ardabili, a great number of mystics founded tariqas (orders) that do not differ essentially from the Hesychast esotericism of St. Gregory Palamas. But their failure to oppose and eliminate a) the theological dogmatism (within both, Islamic and Christian, contexts), b) the numerous yet absurd versions of rationalism, c) the treacherous and impious notions of nominalism, and d) the persistent but calamitous impact of Greco-Roman philosophy prevented a great number of Christian and Muslim mystics from bringing spirituality back to the epicenter of human life.
It was only a matter of time for fanatics to take possession of Islam and spread darkness and ignorance from Ottoman Constantinople; when the Observatory of Taqi ad-Din Muhammad ibn Maaruf was attacked and destroyed (1580) by a lunatic mob guided by ignorant, silly, and vicious Sunni theologians, the indivisible corpus of Islamic science and spirituality was considered as the enemy of the prevailing bogus-Islamic dogma and therefore persecuted by the Satanic sheikhulislams.
In Western Europe both, secular spiritual movements (like the Cathars, the Templars, the Rosicrucians, etc.) and Christian orders (Benedictines, Jesuits), originated from the Gnostics and several religious priesthoods of the Late Antiquity. It was inevitable for the former to lose a large part of their documentation and spiritual potency as they were clandestine organizations and for the latter -as the winners- to indulge themselves in very immoral and sinful mindset, attitude and behavior. Even worse, the persistent clash of the two spiritual nebulae brought forth disproportionate hatred, abysmal negativity, and further spiritual loss.
There is no spirituality wherever the lie exists, let alone prevails; there is only the curse of God (קִלְלַת אלוהים/kalalt Elohim) there. This concerns not only the Jesuits and the pseudo-Freemasons (launched in England in 1717; about whom we have already discussed), but also the fake Rosicrucian orders of our times, namely the so-called Order of the Golden and Rosy Cross (1750s–1790s), the bogus-Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (1887–1903), and the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia (1865–present). They all usurped the name of Christian Rosenkreuz with whom they have nothing in common and whose spiritual heritage they viciously loath. On the contrary, the early 17th c. German Rosicrucians trustworthily reflected the spiritual inheritance left and the masterful example of life offered by Christian Rosenkreuz, although I don't accept all three manifestos as unbiased.
By having Late Antiquity Gnostics as their masters and points of reference, almost all the modern European mystics, psychics and magicians failed to perceive accurately and comprehensively the spiritual universe. Few great scholars and mystics make the exception in this regard, the likes of Herman of Karantania (Carinthia; 1105-1154) and Christian Rosenkreuz (1378-1484); this is so, because they traveled in Africa and Asia and contacted Muslim, Jewish, Oriental Christian, Parsi Zoroastrian masters and scholars there.
In terms of Spiritual Ontology, the most common mistake that deceitful mystics, occultists, and spiritual fraudsters, such as Helena Blavatsky, Rudolf Steiner, George Gurdjieff, Aleister Crowley, Alice Bailey, and many others made was the absurd acceptance of the following four as the basic elements in nature: Earth, Water, Air and Fire. Franz Bardon certainly broke with this erroneous and misleading tradition, by systematically stating that at the origin of all is Ether. All the same, when their sources were wrong, they were predestined to spiritual failure, moral misconduct, and final damnation.
As a matter of fact, they could not perform better, because their readings and their references were misleading. All these authors were not in a position to go through authoritative sacred texts of superior societies like those of 3rd millennium BCE Mesopotamia and Egypt and have thus access to original spirituality. The cuneiform and hieroglyphic sources, which would help them best comprehend and sense the spiritual universe, were not yet deciphered or they were deciphered but few texts were published, transliterated, and translated - let alone analyzed.
Even more importantly, Water cannot be considered as one element, but two. Late Antiquity Gnostics were totally disoriented and misled in this regard. In striking contrast, early cosmological narratives and sacred texts clearly differentiate between Soft Waters (Apsu/Ocean) and Salt Waters (Tiamat/Sea). The latter is in fact the 'survival' (or 'maintenance') of the pre-creational chaos within the Order of the Creation. Salt Waters (Sea) is what humans must most categorically abstain from; this is what Jesus named "the Father of the Devil" (John 8:44). At this point, Modern English translations are wrong, because they repeat a mistake already made in the Vulgate. And by using this phrase, Jesus takes position against the theory as per which Elohim created the Devil; by so doing, Jesus is evidently closer to Assyrian-Babylonian cosmological standards and concepts than to Old Testament notions.
On the other hand, Fire is not an original element; it is a subordinate or derivative element that emanates from the Salt Waters. As such, Fire is a soiling substance that was duly reviled by all the early humans. Indeed, it was forcefully introduced as 'holy' element by the devilish, early Mithraic priesthood in Central Asia. Zoroaster and the Achaemenid dynasty of Iran engaged in ferocious and merciless battles against the abominable Mithraic Magi, who intended to impose their polytheistic dogma in Iran and to make the Iranians consider Fire as a 'holy' element.
It goes without saying that the ontological differentiation is considerable and stern; it impacts Spiritual Anthropology in a most disastrous way. "Four Elements" (Earth, Water, Air and Fire) instead of "Five Elements" (Ether, Earth, Soft Waters, Air and Salt Waters): this is enough to cause detrimental changes in the spiritual exercises one may make, and this development may impact enormously the ascetic soldier.
I read with great interest your email's last paragraphs about your life; for me there are not 'better' or 'worse' persons in this life. Even if many sins are involved in the life of a person, while another person committed only few and minor transgressions, the lives of the humans are independent trajectories like comets the deeper meaning and function of which only God knows. I therefore find it very normal to always expect to learn from anyone and from anything; consequently, I never comment on others' lives and life models, merely accepting or rejecting at the very personal level and on the basis of my standards (that I have progressively established during my life). That is why I admire always the people, who can offer life examples whatever their socio-professional life or economic status may be - either they lived in Iran like me or they explored India like you!
Many thanks for your time, responses, advice and attachments!
Best regards,
Shamsaddin
================
Download the article in PDF:
carmen de los mártires in granada, spain ⋅ ph. iharvera
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ετάνα: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία, Ελληνική Εκπαιδευτική Εγκυκλοπαίδεια, 1989
Кузьма Мегаломматис, Этана: мировая мифология, Греческая педагогическая энциклопедия, 1989
Kosmas Megalommatis, Etana: Weltmythologie, Griechische Pädagogische Enzyklopädie, 1989
Kosmas Gözübüyükoğlu, Etana: Dünya Mitolojisi, Yunan Pedagoji Ansiklopedisi, 1989
قزمان ميغالوماتيس، اتانا : اساطیر جهانی، دایره المعارف آموزشی یونانی، 1989
Côme Megalommatis, Etana: Mythologie mondiale, Encyclopédie pédagogique grecque, 1989
1989 قزمان ميغالوماتيس، إيتانا : الأساطير العالمية، الموسوعة التربوية اليونانية،
Cosimo Megalommatis, Etana: mitologia mondiale, Enciclopedia pedagogica greca, 1989
Cosimo Megalommatis, Etana: mitología mundial, Enciclopedia pedagógica griega, 1989
Cosmas Megalommatis, Etana: World Mythology, Greek Pedagogical Encyclopedia, 1989
------------------------
Скачать PDF-файл: / PDF-Datei herunterladen: / Télécharger le fichier PDF : / PDF dosyasını indirin: / :PDF قم بتنزيل ملف / Download PDF file: / : یک فایل دانلود کنید / Κατεβάστε το PDF:
Ephesus, Turkey, Greece, False History, and Intolerance: by terrifying the average Greek, Greece's Mass Media sets the Stage for National Disaster
ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ”
Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 28η Απριλίου 2018.
Σε αντιπαράθεση με διαφωνούντα αναγνώστη του, ο κ. Μπαϋρακτάρης αναπαράγει πλήθος στοιχείων παλαιοτέρων δημοσιεύσεών μου και συζητήσεών μας, πιστά ακολουθώντας την ερμηνευτική προσέγγιση και το πρότυπο ιστορικής-πολιτισμικής σύνθεσης, τα οποία έχω εισαγάγει. Και έτσι, πολύ ορθά καταλήγει στο συμπέρασμα ότι σήμερα ανήκει εξολοκλήρου στην Τουρκία η πολιτισμική κληρονομιά της Εφέσου - αρχικά γνωστής ως Άπασα χάρη σε χιττιτικά κείμενα της 2ης χιλιετίας τα οποία αγνοούνται ολότελα από την αμόρφωτη, άξεστη, περιθωριακή και ρατσιστική ψευδο-πανεπιστημιακή ελίτ της Ελλάδας.
-------------------------------
https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2018/04/28/έφεσος-τουρκία-ελλάδα-ψευτοϊστορία-κ/ =================================
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Ρωμιοσύνη, Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή Αυτοκρατορία
Ό,τι ακολουθεί είναι ο διάλογος που έγινε με δύο σχολιαστές σχετικά με το σε ποιούς ανήκει η ιστορική, πολιτισμική κληρονομιά της χιττιτικής – ιωνικής (ελληνικής) – ρωμαϊκής – χριστιανορωμέϊκης Εφέσου.
Το βίντεο αφορούσε την Τροία αλλά ο διάλογος επεκτάθηκε στην Έφεσο και γενικώτερες ιστορικές θεωρήσεις.
“Μετά τους Σκοπιανούς & οι Τούρκοι επιχειρούν να παραχαράξουν την ελληνική ιστορία”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeXAUR9LcL0
Αντίκρουση κι απόρριψη του βίντεο έχει αναπτυχθεί εδώ:
Τροία, Τουρκία, Ελλάδα, Ψευτοϊστορία, κι η Αποβλάκωση του Μέσου Έλληνα από τα ΜΜΕ που προετοιμάζουν Εθνική Συρρίκνωση
https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2018/04/28/τροία-τουρκία-ελλάδα-ψευτοϊστορία-κι/
(και πλέον: https://www.academia.edu/60670307/Τροία_Τουρκία_Ελλάδα_Ψευτοϊστορία_κι_η_Αποβλάκωση_του_Μέσου_Έλληνα_από_τα_ΜΜΕ_που_προετοιμάζουν_Εθνική_Συρρίκνωση)
A K
Η Τσιλέρ παλαιότερα, δείχνοντας την Έφεσο σε ξένους διπλωμάτες είχε πει: “Είναι έργα των προγόνων μας”.
Σήμερα κάνει το ίδιο κι’ο Ερτογάν.
Μήπως θέλουν να μας πούν ότι είναι ελληνικής καταγωγής, γι’αυτό θεωρούν ότι είναι έργα των προγόνων τους;;;;
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Είχε δίκιο η Τσιλέρ.
Τα μνημεία δεν ανήκουν σε λαούς που χάνονται μέσα στην Ιστορία αλλά σε τόπους που είναι πάντα εκεί.
Έφεσος: η γνωστή από χιττιτικά κείμενα της 2 ης προχριστιανικής χιλιετίας ως Άπασα πόλη της δυτικής Ανατολίας, η ιστορία και τα μνημεία της ανήκουν στην Τουρκία, και όχι στην Ελλάδα.
Τα αρχαιοελληνικά μνημεία κι οι ναοί της Σικελίας είναι έργα των προγόνων των Ιταλών.
Επίσης, οι περισσότεροι Ρωμιοί της Ορθόδοξης Αυτοκρατορίας από το 1071 μέχρι το 1923 έγιναν μουσουλμάνοι (‘τούρκεψαν’).
Οπότε, κι απ’ αυτή την άποψη σωστά τα είπε η Τσιλέρ.
Και θα το καταλάβαιναν όλοι αυτό στην Ελλάδα, αν δεν είχε τυραννικά επιβληθεί από το ξενόδουλο κατεστημένο ένας αντιτουρκισμός κι ένα μίσος που όποιος τα έχει μέσα του δεν είναι Χριστιανός αλλά Σατανιστής.
A K
Οι πρόγονοι φανερώνουν καταγωγή, φυλή, ράτσα. Αν έχει δίκιο, τότε είναι ελληνίδα μουσουλμάνα.
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Ρωμιά μουσουλμάνα – όταν άρχισαν να καταφθάνουν τουρκικά φύλα (οι Σελτζούκοι 5000 ήταν όλοι κι όλοι – συν γυναιξί και τέκνοις), δεν υπήρχαν Έλληνες, Υπήρχαν ελληνόφωνοι Ρωμιοί κι η αυτοκρατορία ονομαζόταν Ρωμανία..
Μα αυτό είναι οι Τούρκοι κι αυτός ήταν ο εθνικισμός που συνέθεσε ως κρατικό δόγμα ο Ατατούρκ: η πολιτιστική κληρονομιά όλων των λαών της Ανατολίας (Μικρά Ασία + Καππαδοκία + Πόντος + Βόρεια Μεσοποταμία). Όχι μια ταύτιση με τους τουρκόφωνους του Καυκάσου και της Κεντρικής Ασίας.
Όποιος έχει πάει σε Ουζμπεκιστάν και Καζακστάν καταλαβαίνει ότι οι Τούρκοι δεν έχουν το σουλούπι των Κεντρασιατών.
Όσο δε για τους παντουρανιστές του Μπαχτσελί που αναφέρονται στον Ατατούρκ: κάθε που μιλάνε, γυρίζει ο Ατατούρκ μέσα στον τάφο του.
A K
Μόνο που η Έφεσος είναι Ελληνικό μνημείο, κι’όχι Ρωμαικό. Στην ‘Εφεσο αναφερόταν όταν έλεγε, ότι ήταν έργα των προγόνων της.
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Εντελώς λάθος. Σου έχουν μάθει (όχι σε σένα προσωπικά αλλά σε όλους όσους κάνετε το ίδιο λάθος) και δεν έχεις απορρίψει μια ψευδέστατη ερμηνεία της Ιστορίας.
Πριν από όλα, η Έφεσος είναι πόλη γνωστή τη 2η προχριστιανική χιλιετία από χιττιτικά κείμενα. Ήταν πρωτεύουσα του ανατολιακού κράτους Αρζάουα κι ονομαζόταν Άπασα.
Το όνομα αυτό παραφθάρηκε σε Έφεσος. Με την άφιξη των Ιώνων δημιουργήθηκε ένας μεικτός πολιτισμός, κι η Ιωνία οργανώθηκε στο Κοινό των Ιώνων όπου αργότερα προσκλήθηκε κι η αιολική αρχικά Σμύρνη.
Ιωνικός είναι ο πολιτισμός της τότε Εφέσου κι ως εκ τούτου πολύ διαφορετικός από εκείνον της δωρικής Σπάρτης. Η επονομασία Έλληνες είναι ένας φτειαχτός όρος.
Όταν έχεις διαφορετικές γλώσσες και διαφορετικούς πολιτισμούς, διαφορετικά πολιτεύματα και διαφορετικές αξίες, τότε έχει δύο ή και περισσότερους πολιτισμούς και να τους δώσεις ένα συγκεφαλαιωτικό όνομα, βοηθάει μόνο στη θολούρα.
Είναι σαν να μου λες ότι σήμερα υπάρχει ‘ευρωπαϊκός πολιτισμός’. Ψέμμα! Άλλο οι Πολωνοί κι άλλο οι Βέλγοι. ‘Άλλο οι Ούγγροι κι άλλο οι Σουηδοί, κοκ.
Τώρα, επειδή έχω πάει στην Έφεσσο κι έχω θαυμάσει τον τεράστιο αρχαιολογικό χώρο, ξέρω ότι σχεόν όλα όσα σώζονται εκεί και κυρίως η πρόσοψη της Βιβλιοθήκης του Κέλσου είναι ρωμαϊκά κι όχι ελληνικά (ή ιωνικά μνημεία).
Η Έφεσος έγινε ρωμαϊκή το 129 π.Χ.. Η Βιβλιοθήκη του Κέλσου κτίσθηκε το 117 μ.Χ. Μιλάμε για σχεδόν 250 χρόνια. Είναι η απόσταση από τον Κοσμά Αιτωλό σε μας σήμερα.
Ο Κέλσος ήταν Ρωμαίος συγκλητικός και ύπατος πιθανώτατα ιωνικής καταγωγής. Το τι ακουγόταν σαν γλώσσα γύρω από εκείνα τα κτήρια ήταν ως επί το πλείστον λατινικά. Τα ελληνικά, τα μελετούσαν (και βέβαια πολλοί ντόπιοι τα μιλούσαν αλλά ανάμεικτα με πολλές λατινικές λέξεις) αλλά αυτοί που ανήγειραν και χρησιμοποίησαν το συγκεκριμένο μνημείο ήταν Ρωμαίοι αξιωματούχοι – όχι Έλληνες.
Ο Κέλσος λεγόταν Τιβέριος Ιούλιος Κέλσος. Ξέρεις κανένα Αχαιό, Αιολό, Ίωνα ή Δωριέα που λέγεται Τιβέριος??????
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Επίσης / Διάβασε:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephesus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Celsus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiberius_Julius_Celsus_Polemaeanus
A K
Τάχω ψάξει και γώ. Τάχεις πολύ μπερδρεμένα μέσα στο μυαλό σου, κι’ούτε σύ δεν καταλαμβαίνεις τι λές.
Εκτός κι’άν είσαι ο “γνωστός”ανθέλληνας παραχαράκτης της ιστορίας, που δέν αναγνωρίζει τα έργα των προγόνων του, κι απο τους Σκοπιανόπληκτους που θέλουν να ονομαστούν τα Σκόπια,” Μακεδονία”.
Αφού η Έφεσος είναι γνωστή απο τη δεύτερη χιλιετία π.χ, πως είναι Ρωμαική; εφ’όσον όπως αναφέρεις, έγινε Ρωμαική το129 πχ;
Επομένως δεν ιδρύθηκε απο τους Ρωμαίους.
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Ποιος είναι ο “γνωστός” ανθέλληνας;
Δεν έχω μπερδεμένη την ιστορία στο μυαλό μου αλλά εσύ κι οι περισσότεροι δεν έχετε καταλάβει ότι σας έμαθαν μια ψευτοϊστορία που βολεύει μόνον τους Άγγλους, τους Γάλλους και τους Αμερικανούς για να κάνουν ένα ψευτοκράτος με μια ψεύτικη ταυτότητα όπως η Ελλάδα ό,τι θέλουν όποτε το θέλουν.
Για κάθε συμφορά που υφίσταται η χώρα ο κύριος υπαίτιος είναι το ψευτοϊστορικό δόγμα κι η διεστραμμένη ταυτότητα που ο κάθε Ρωμιός Ορθόδοξος σχηματίζει και πιστεύει ότι έχει.
Η χώρα θέλει οριστική διάλυση κι ανασύσταση. Άλλωστε, όταν λέμε ότι οι αγωνιστές του 1821 προδόθηκαν, αυτό λέμε. Το σατανοκράτος αυτό του σιωνισμού και της μασωνίας πρέπει να διαλυθεί για να σωθεί η Ρωμιοσύνη. Γιατί όσο παραμένει υπαρκτή η ψευτο-Ελλάδα τόσο προχωρεί η σιωνιστική ατζέντα της εξόντωσης του γένους μας.
Ο Μακρόν ετοιμάζει τον Τάφο της Ελλάδας και της Ευρώπης: φέρνει 200 εκ. Αφρικανούς μέσα στα επόμενα 30 χρόνια
https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2018/04/19/ο-μακρόν-ετοιμάζει-τον-τάφο-της-ελλάδα/
Μα γιατί μπερδεύεις την Ιστορία έτσι;
Άλλο ο τόπος σε μια α’ περίοδο που τότε αναφέρεται σε ιστορικά κείμενα για πρώτη φορά (χιττιτική – ανατολιακή περίοδος),
άλλο ο τόπος σε μια β’ περίοδο που αναφέρεται σε μεταγενέστερα κείμενα (ιωνική – αρχαία ελληνική περίοδος),
άλλο ο τόπος σε μια γ’ περίοδο που και αναφέρεται σε άλλα κείμενα και που από τότε σώζονται τα περισσότερα μνημεία που βρίσκονται εκεί (ρωμαϊκή περίοδος),
άλλο ο τόπος σε μια δ’ περίοδο όταν εκχριστιανίζεται κι αναφέρεται στην Αποκάλυψη (χριστιανορωμαϊκή περίοδος), κοκ.
Η Ιστορία τις περισσότερες φορές είναι μια συνέχεια και μια ανάμειξη. Λίγες φορές λόγω ολοσχερούς εξόντωσης υπάρχει διακοπή κι αλλαγή.
Βεβαίως η Έφεσος δεν ιδρύθηκε από τους Ρωμαίους. Αλλά τα εκεί σωζόμενα μνημεία είναι ρωμαϊκά. Δεν είναι ούτε χιττιτικά, ούτε ιωνικά-ελληνικά, ούτε σελτζουκικά-τουρκικά. Αλλά όλη η ιστορική κληρονομιά ενός τόπου βρίσκεται στα χέρια της σημερινής χώρας όπου ο τόπος αυτός (ο κάθε τόπος) ανήκει.
Με ένα βήμα παραπάνω λοιπόν η Τσιλέρ θα καταλάβαινε ότι οι πρόγονοί της δεν ήρθαν από τις στέππες της Κεντρικής Ασίας αλλά ήταν ντόπιοι ελληνόφωνοι Ρωμιοί Ορθόδοξοι που μια στιγμή αλλαξοπίστησαν.
Ο Αντιτουρκισμός είναι βαλτός από ντόπια όργανα Άγγλων, Γάλλων κι Αμερικανών έτσι ώστε να δημιουργήσει αλυσιδωτές αντιδράσεις και ν’ απομακρύνει τα δυο τμήματα του ίδιου γένους από την προοπτική του να επανωθούν.
Οι μισαλλόδοξοι αντι-Τούρκοι, αν δουν την καταστροφή που έφεραν στην Ρωμιοσύνη, θα αυτοκτονήσουν.
A K
Ενώ οι Τούρκοι εκτός απο γενοκτονίες, πολέμους, 400 χρόνια σκλαβιάς, σε χώρες που δεν τους ανήκαν, ήταν αγγελούδια. Ακόμα και σήμερα οι απόγονοι των Σελτζούκων παραμένουν βαρβαροι,όπως βάρβαροι είναι και οι τουρκορωμιοί απόγονοι των αρχαίων ρωμαίων.
Και παρεπιπτόντως, για ποιά ένωση μιλάς; Αυτή που προωθούν όσοι θέλουν να Τουρκέψουμε; Όσοι έχουν την επιθυμία να τεθούν υπό την αιγίδα του Ερτογάν, να πάνε στη Τουρκία, και ν’αφήσουν τους Ελληνες ήσυχους, αρκετά υπέφεραν απο τους βάρβαρους Τούρκο- μόγγολους, ισλαμιστές.
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Αυτό δεν είναι απάντηση σε τίποτα από όσα σου είπα. Κι επιπλέον είναι και λαθεμένο και μισαλλόδοξο. Αν θα είχες σπουδάσει 10 χρόνια σε πανεπιστήμια στη Γερμανία, την Αμερική, την Ρωσσία ή την Κίνα κι αν είχες ειδικευθεί σε σελτζουκικό, οθωμανικό, άλλους τουρανικούς και μογγολικό πολιτισμό, δεν θα έδειχνες τόσο αμόρφωτο χαϊβάνι!
Πρέπει να καταλάβεις ότι είσαι το θύμα αυτών που σε κυβερνούν και που σε βούλιαξαν σε μια ψευτο-ιστορία για να γίνεις του χεριού τους τόσο όσο όταν βγάζεις από το στόμα σου αυτά τα ξερατά που κάνουν σίγουρη την εξαφάνιση της Ρωμιοσύνης με τη διάλυση του ελληνικού κράτους.
Το ότι οι Τουρκορωμιοί είναι απόγονοι των αρχαίων Ρωμαίων είναι άλλη μια απόδειξη του τρομερού κόμπλεξ κατωτερότητας που νοιώθεις για την κακομοιριά στην οποία σε βούλιαξε το κατεστημένο που έκανε τη χώρα σου ένα σκουπίδι του κλώτσου και του μπάτσου.
Όσο για τις γενοκτονίες που ψευδέστατα αποδίδουν στους Τούρκους αυτοί που ξεφτιλίζουν τη σημερινλη Ελλάδα, αυτές πρέπει να ήταν τίποτα μπροστά στο τι κάναμε εμείς που είχαμε και μεγάλο αυτοκράτορα που επονομάσθηκε Βουλγαροκτόνος! Παγκόσμια πρωτοτυπία γενοκτόνων!
Έχω μια συμβουλή να σου δώσω: φτύσε τη χολέρα που άλλοι σου έχουν βάλει μέσα σου. Οδηγεί σε θάνατο. Ένας Χριστιανός στέκεται στην Αγάπη.
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Βλέπεις πόσο φοβιτσιάρη σε έχουν καταντήσει; Θλιβερό! Ποιος σου είπε ότι μου αρέσει ο Ερντογάν; Έχω γράψει επανειλημμένα εναντίον του.
Κι ακόμη χειρότερα, ποιος σου είπε ότι μια επανένωση των ελληνόφωνων Ορθοδόξων Ρωμιών με τους τουρκόφωνους Μουσουλμάνους Ρωμιούς σημαίνει ότι εμείς θα τουρκέψουμε κι όχι ότι εκείνοι θα ρωμιο-συνειδητοποιηθούν;
Και ψέμματα τα περί ισλαμιστών! Ούτε το 25% των Τούρκων δεν είναι πιστοί μουσουλμάνοι. Φανατικοί δεν πρέπει να είναι πάνω από 10%. Οι κεμαλικοί των δυτικών και νότιων παραλίων, της Σμύρνης και της Πόλης είναι πολύ κοντά μας.
Σε έχουν τυφλώσει κι όχι μόνο δεν βλέπεις αλλά και φοβάσαι από πάνω. Έτσι καταντήσανε σήμερα τον άλλοτε λεβέντη Ρωμιό. Κρίμα!
A K
Για πιό λόγο να γίνει αυτή η ένωση; για να γίνουμε “Κούρδοι”; η για να πάρουν το φυσικό αέριο της Ελλάδας και της Κύπρου;
Μια χώρα των 80.000.000 αυτή είναι που θα κάνει κουμάντο, κι’Ελλάδα θάναι μιά επαρχία της Τουρκίας, δεν χρειάζεται πολύ μυαλό, για να το καταλάβει κάποιος.
Όπως και νάχει απ’ότι φαίνεται δουλεύεις για τα συμφέροντα των τούρκων, και παριστάνεις το έλληνα. Δυστυχώς κάτι τέτοιοι σαν και σένα κατήντησαν σ’αυτό το χάλι την Ελλάδα. Δεν έχει νόημα η συνέχιση της κουβέντας μεταξύ μας.
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Εδώ δεν εκφράζεις μόνον φόβο και άγνοια αλλά και πλήρη έλλειψη φαντασίας. Και δεν υπάρχει στον άνθρωπο τίποτα ανώτερο σαν θείο δώρο από την φαντασία. Αλλά βέβαια τόσο νεκρικά είναι τα ψέμματα που επιβάλλει με τυραννικό κατεστημένο που σκοτώνουν τις ψυχές των ανθρώπων και καταντούν τα μυαλά τους κάτι σαν προγραμματισμένα ρομποτάκια ή – πιο απλά – κασέτες που επαναλαμβάνονται.
Ουσιαστικά κάνεις ένα πολύ σημαντικό ερώτημα αλλά αυτό θα το αφήσω για το τέλος.
Σου είπα εγώ να γίνουμε Κούρδοι;
Αλλά ξέρεις γιατί εσύ με ρωτάς κάτι τέτοιο;
Γιατί βαθειά μέσα στο μυαλό σου ξέρεις ότι τα τουρκικά πανεπιστήμια είναι ανώτερα από τα ελληνικά, ότι στην Τουρκία υπάρχουν πολλά ξενόγλωσσα πανεπιστήμια ενώ στην Ελλάδα κανένα, κι έτσι φοβάσαι ότι ο μέσος Έλληνας απλά θα δείξει την κατωτερότητά του μπροστά του μέσου Τούρκου. Κι αυτό είναι αλήθεια.
Αλλά αν προτείνω κάτι τέτοιο, το κάνω επειδή μια τέτοια ένωση θα είναι ταυτόχρονα αποδέσμευση κι απελεύθέρωση του μέσου Έλληνα από την πανούκλα που τον κυβερνάει και θέλει να τον ξεκάνει.
Αυτό δείχνει την αλήθεια: τα τελευταία 10 χρόνια πάνω από μισό εκατομμύριο Έλληνες, στην συντριπτική πλειοψηφία τους νέοι έφυγαν εκτός Ελλάδας και με σκοπό να μην ξαναγυρίσουν. Το 2010 φύγαμε η γυναίκα μου και γω. Τότε είχαμε ένα παιδί και τώρα έχουμε 7 και περιμένουμε το 8ο πρώτα ο Θεός.
Εκεί θα μείνουν τελικά όσοι λυμαίνονται τον τόπο, δηλαδή
α) τα καθάρματα του δημοσίου που σαν εγκληματίες κλέφτες απαιτούν να πληρώνουν οι παραγωγικοί άνθρωποι τους κηφήνες,
β) οι κομματικοί παράγοντες και
γ) τα ανώτερα στελέχη του κατεστημένου (από δημοσιογράφους και καθηγητές ψευτοπανεπιστημίων μέχρι κυπατζήδες κι άχρηστους στρατιωτικούς, κι από τους επαγελματίες πολιτικούς μέχρι τους μεγαλοεργολάβους και τους ψευτο-επιχειρηματίες των κρατικοδίαιτων.
Γιατί σ’ έκαναν να πιστεύεις όσα πιστεύεις; Για να κυβερνάνε αυτοί και να πίνουν εις υγείαν του κορόϊδου (εσένα). Εσύ δεν μπορείς ν’αντιληφθείς πόσο κοντά στον πάτο είστε;
Τα όσα πιστεύεις σε αδρανοποιούν κι αυτό ακριβώς επιδιώκουν αυτοί που θέλουν να διαλύσουν την χώρα. Γιατί μόνον 100000 αν ξυπνήσουν και ξεσηκωθούν αποφασισμένοι να κάψουν τα πάντα, οι 300 κακούργοι δεν θα προλάβουν να πάρουν το αεροπλάνο….
Εγώ να δουλεύω για την Τουρκία; Έχω τέσσερις υπηκοότητες, το σπίτι μου είναι στο Καζακστάν, η δουλειά μου σε Κένυα και Τανζανία, και διευθύνω τρεις επιχειρήσεις που έχω συνεταιρικά με Έλληνες από την Αστάνα και το Πεκίνο, με Καζάκους και Ρώσσους από το Καζακστάν, και με Κινέζους. Σκασίλα που θα είχα για να με πληρώσουν ένα ξεροκόμματο οι Τούρκοι!
Τα παιδιά μου πάνε στο γερμανικό σχολείο, ελληνικά και ρωσσικά μαθαίνουν στο σπίτι, κι οι Έλληνες συνεταίροι μου είναι τόσο σημαντικοί που θα πρέπει να πλειοδοτήσει το τουρκικό κράτος για να με πάρει (αν υποτεθεί ότι θα το ενδιέφερα κι αν τρελλαθούμε και σκεφθούμε ότι θα δεχόμουνα). Φαίνεται δεν με ξέρεις. Αυτό το βίντεο (παλιό από προηγούμενο κανάλι που έκλεισε πριν από 14 μήνες) θα σου δώσει μια ιδέα για το σε πόσες και ποιες χώρες έχω ταξιδέψει πριν φύγω στο εξωτερικό για δουλειές:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0xgJwW-F4Y
Μου λες ότι άνθρωποι σαν και μένα κατάντησαν την Ελλάδα σ’ αυτό το χάλι. Μα οι ιδέες μου, οι θέσεις μου κι οι γνώσεις μου απορρίπτονται από τα καθάρματα που κυβέρνησαν την Ελλάδα όσο εγώ έχω ζήσει (κι είμαι γεννημένος το 1956).
Αυτοί όλοι πιστεύουν αυτό που πιστεύεις και συ.
Εσύ κυβερνάς την Ελλάδα με τις απόψεις και τις θέσεις, πλην όμως το κατεστημένο σ’ έπιασε κορόιδο και παίρνει εκείνο όλο το κέρδος αφήνοντάς σε με το φόβο που σε λίγο θα γίνει πανικός όταν οι 50000+ ισλαμιστές έμπειροι πολεμιστές που βρίσκονται στην Αθήνα ξεσηκωθούν και σας σκοτώσουν για να σας ληστέψουν.
Τέλος, θα απαντήσω στην ερώτησή σου για να ικανοποιήσω την περιέργειά σου! Για ποιο λόγο να γίνει η ένωση.
Έχεις αναλογιστεί τι θα είχε συμβεί αν δεν είχε γίνει η ελληνική επανάσταση του 1821 που την υποκίνησαν Άγγλοι και Γάλλοι και που πήραν απόλυτα τον έλεγχό της ήδη πριν από το 1828 χάρη σε καθάρματα στυλ Κωλέττη και Μαυροκορδάτου, διαμορφώνοντας έτσι ένα χρεωκοπημένο κράτος γεννημένο νεκρό ουσιαστικά που δεν δίστασαν να γελοιποιήσουν το 1850 με τα γεγονότα του Πατσίφικο; Ούτως ή άλλως το νεοελληνικό κράτος ήταν άχρηστο πλέον, εφόσον ρητά τα όνειρα των αγωνιστών του 1821 προδόθηκαν – κι αυτό είναι χιλιο-ειπωμένο.
Αν δεν είχε γίνει λοιπόν η ελληνική επανάσταση, η Οθωμανική Αυτοκρατορία δεν θα είχε αποσταθεροποιηθεί, δεδομένου ότι, λαδώνοντας και διαφθείροντας ανυποψίαστους φουκαράδες εδώ και κει και πιέζοντας αποσχιστικές τάσεις σε Ελλάδα, Σερβία, Βλαχία, Αίγυπτο, Λίβανο, Άντεν και Αλγερία, οι Γάλλοι κι οι Άγγλοι προσπαθούσαν να αποδυναμώσουν το κράτος, όπου μετά τους Τούρκους οι Έλληνες ήταν η πολυπληθέστερη ομάδα στην διοίκησή του και στη διπλωματία του. Αναφορικά με την οθωμανική οικονομία του 1820, οι Έλληνες, οι Αρμένιοι, κι οι Ιουδαίοι ήταν πλουσιώτεροι κι από τους Τούρκους.
Αν δεν είχε αποσταθεροποιηθεί η Οθωμανική Αυτοκρατορία κι οι Έλληνες ήταν σ’ αυτήν ένα από τα τρία οικονομικά ισχυρώτερα έθνη το 1900, όταν θα άρχιζε η εκμετάλλευση των πετρελαίων, η χώρα δεν θα διαλυόταν και τα πετρέλαια των σημερινών Ιράκ, Κουβέϊτ, Σαουδικής Αραβίας, Κάταρ, κι Εμιράτων θα τα εκμεταλλεύονταν οι Έλληνες, οι Αρμένιοι κι οι Ιουδαίοι.
Αυτό σημαίνει ότι μια χώρα από την Αλγερία μέχρι το Ομάν κι από τη Ρουμανία με ελληνικά, τουρκικά κι αραβικά ως επίσημες γλώσσες θα εκμοντερνιζόταν τον 20ο αιώνα χάρη στα τεράστια οικονομικά της έσοδα που θα την έκαναν χωρίς υπερβολή μια από τις 2-3 μεγαλύτερες χώρες του κόσμου. Κι εννοείται ότι δεν θα υπήρχε καθόλου ισλαμική τρομοκρατία που είναι δυτικής επινόησης παρασκεύασμα.
Το μίσος κι η αρρώστεια που ψιθύρισαν οι Άγγλοι κι οι Γάλλοι στ’ αυτιά των Ελλήνων, των Αρμενίων κι άλλων πολλών εναντίον του ίδιου του κράτους τους (της Οθωμανικής Αυτοκρατορίας) ήταν μια σατανική διαστροφή που την πλήρωσαν κι οι Αρμένιοι, την πληρώσαμε και μεις που ήμασταν πολυπληθέστεροι και σε κεντρικώτερη θέση.
Αλλά την μισαλλοδοξία την τιμωρεί ο Θεός. Μισώντας αντί να αγαπάς τον πλησίον σου, γίνεσαι σατανιστής και παύεις να είσαι Χριστιανός.
Έτσι τώρα, είτε σ’ αρέσει είτε όχι, θα πέσει άσχημο τσεκούρι στην Ελλάδα γιατί εδώ πληρώνονται όλα. Η σατανοχώρα που επιτρέπει σε πούστηδες και πλακομούνες να σκοτώνουν τις ψυχές μικρών παιδιών, υιοθετώντας τα, είναι ένα σατανικό αίσχος προ της Τουρκίας (που και βέβαια δεν είναι αγία χώρα – κάθε άλλο!!).
Αντί λοιπόν να επιμένεις στο σκοτεινό αδιέξοδο όπου σε οδήγησαν οι τοποτηρητές των εχθρών του γένους μας, δες την αλήθεια κι η αλήθεια θα σ’ ελευθερώσει.
sakis skoularikis
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Συμφωνω φιλε μου. Εχω εκφραστει κι εγω ετσι, οπως εσυ περιπου, και εχω εισπραξει απο φιλους Ελληνες, μια τεραστια εντυπωση φοβικων τασεων απο μερους τους. Αυτοι που “κινουν νηματα” στην Ελλαδα, εχουν κανει καλη δουλεια. Αυτο που εγραψες, περι ρωμιο-συνειδητοποιησης, δεν το καταλαβαινουν με τιποτα. Σε κουβεντες μου, εχω προσπαθησει να τους το κανω “λιανα”, αλλα και παλι οι παρωπίδες τους, δεν τους αφηνουν να δουν τιποτα.
Συνεχισε να προσπαθεις!!!
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Φχαριστώ για τα καλά σου λόγια και την παρότρυνση! Νάσαι πάντα καλά!
Φίλε μου, έχουμε δουλειές με φούντες μπροστά μας, και μια και βλέπω ότι είσαι από την Ηλεία, πρέπει να καθαρίσουμε την …… Κόπρο του Αυγείου (!!) που πληρωμένοι πράκτορες της Φραγκιάς και της Μασωνίας, της Αμερικής και του Σιωνισμού έβαλαν σιγά-σιγά και για δυο αιώνες στα μυαλά πολλών διαδοχικών γενεών. Και δυστυχώς δεν είμαστε ο Ηρακλής!
Αλλά πιστεύω ότι η Θεία Πρόνοια έχει από καιρό επιλέξει το γένος μας για κάτι μεγάλο (και μέχρι τώρα ήμασταν πολύ μικροί) κι ένας Άνθρωπος μόνος θα έρθει και θα φέρει την ανατροπή. Αλλά δεν θα είναι ούτε με συνηθισμένο υλι(στι)κό τρόπο, ούτε χωρίς αίμα.
Καλημέρα από Ναϊρόμπι – Κένυα
Νίκος – raktn@inbox.ru
Δανιήλ & Ιησούς ορίζουν ότι στο Πλήρωμα του Χρόνου ο “Υιός του Ανθρώπου” είναι “ο Άρχων των Ελλήνων” και θα εξοντώσει το Ισραήλ
https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2017/11/09/δανιήλ-ιησούς-ορίζουν-ότι-στο-πλήρωμ/
sakis skoularikis Α Κ
Εχεις πολυ φοβο μεσα σου φιλε μου. Μπορει καποιος να σε κανει “Κουρδο”, αν εσυ δεν το θελεις;
Φοβασαι μηπως εισαι ευαλωτος σε τετοιο σημειο, ή το ξερεις οτι εισαι; Φιλε μου δεν στα λεω για να σε προσβαλω. Προσπαθω να σου δειξω οτι δεν πρεπει να φοβασαι. Οσο για το “κουμαντο” που λες, να σαι σιγουρος οτι κουμαντο παντα κανει, αυτος που εχει μυαλο. Ποτε τα 80.000.000.
Παρεμπιπτόντως, ειμαι απο Πυργο Ηλειας και δεν εχω γνωρισε ποτε μου Τουρκο, για να μη λες ή νομιζεις.
Brief presentation by Prof. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Table of Contents
I. Berbers
II. The Fallacy of Pan-Arabism
III. Hamitic-Cushitic Historical Heritage Usurped
IV. Hamites & Cushites systematically targeted
V. Anti-Hamitic Hysteria of Western Academics
VI. The Embarrassing History of the Berbers
------------------------------------
Read and download the 2400-word text here:
and