A Short History Of Black Holes On Radio Telescopes

A Short History of Black Holes on Radio Telescopes

So, you’ve probably heard by now that we have our first ever photographs of a black hole and its event horizon. But it’s not like black holes have just been theoretical entities this entire time, awaiting photography’s blessing to finally be anointed as real. We’ve been detecting black holes for a long time now using radio telescopes and infrared cameras. It may be outside the visible spectrum, but that doesn’t mean it ain’t real, son!

The story begins in the mid-1900s when astronomers expanded their horizons beyond the very narrow range of wavelengths to which our eyes are sensitive. Very strong sources of radio waves were discovered and, when accurate positions were determined, many were found to be centered on distant galaxies. Shortly thereafter, radio antennas were linked together to greatly improve angular resolution. These new “interferometers” revealed a totally unexpected picture of the radio emission from galaxies–the radio waves did not appear to come from the galaxy itself, but from two huge “lobes” symmetrically placed about the galaxy….

Ultimately this led to the technique of Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), in which radio signals from antennas across the Earth are combined to obtain the angular resolution of a telescope the size of our planet! Radio images made from VLBI observations soon revealed that the sources at the centers of radio galaxies are “microscopic” by galaxy standards, even smaller than the distance between the sun and our nearest star.

When astronomers calculated the energy needed to power radio lobes they were astounded. It required 10 million stars to be “vaporized,” totally converting their mass to energy using Einstein’s famous equation E = mc2! Nuclear reactions, which power stars, cannot even convert 1 percent of a star’s mass to energy. So trying to explain the energy in radio lobes with nuclear power would require more than 1 billion stars, and these stars would have to live within the “microscopic” volume indicated by the VLBI observations. Because of these findings, astronomers began considering alternative energy sources: supermassive black holes.

We’ve also been tracing the orbits of planets, stars, and other objects that do give off conventional light. All this tracks back to suggest the supermassive black holes that Laplace et al first theorized about hundreds of years ago.

So, we knew what we were looking for. That’s how we were able to find it. And boom! Now we’ve got its photograph too. No more hiding from us, you goddamn light-devouring singularities. We’ve got your number.

50 Lovingly Restored Photographs of the Earth Taken by Apollo Astronauts

For his Earth Restored project, Toby Ord digitally remastered 50 photographs of the whole Earth taken by Apollo astronauts during their missions in the 60s and 70s.

The Apollo photographs are historic works of art. So in restoring them, I sought to bring out their own beauty. I refrained from recomposing the images by cropping, or trying to leave my own mark or interpretation. Perhaps in some cases this would make a more pleasing image, but it was not my aim.

And the Apollo photographs are also a scientific record of what our Earth looks like. In particular, what it would have looked like from the perspective of the astronaut taking the shot. So rather than pumping the saturation or adjusting the colours to what we think the Earth looks like, I wanted to allow us to learn from these photographs something about how it actually appears.

Many of these shots are new to me – the Apollo program and its scientific and cultural output continue to be revelatory 50 years later. (My only quibble here: the images on the website are not high-res. Would love to see much bigger versions of these.)

6 notes View Post

scenesofspace

9 years ago

The last shuttle

1K notes View Post

scenesofspace

9 years ago

In color and silhouette, The Last Planet

1K notes View Post

scenesofspace

9 years ago

Where did the Moon come from?

The Moon is about 40 to 140 million years younger than the Earth and its geology offers broad hints that it was formed in an impact. This is called the giant impact hypothesis.

Nobody can be sure what actually happened, but computer simulations provide some clues. In one simulation, the newly-formed Earth suffers an impact with another planet (called Theia, a little larger than Mars). Theia is torn apart, its core dragged down through Earth’s interior to merge with the Earth’s core. Much of Theia’s mantle is absorbed into Earth’s mantle, and the side of Theia furthest away from the impact is hurled into space. About half the material ejected by the collision is lost and the rest accretes to form the Moon.

The Earth’s axis is tilted, and it is left spinning faster than it does today. A day lasts about ten hours. Months are much shorter too, as the new Moon orbits the Earth much faster. It is also much closer. Had there been anyone on Earth to observe it, they would have glimpsed a Moon twice the present size in the Earth’s primitive sky.

The Moon has since slowed the Earth’s spin, and it is moving away from us at a rate of almost 4 centimetres a year.

You can learn more about the birth of our Moon via Origins: The Scientific Story of Creation by Jim Baggott, or by following #BaggottOrigins across social media.

Image: Moon, by Yutaka Tsutano. CC-BY-2.0 via Flickr.

144 notes View Post

scenesofspace

9 years ago