Κοσμάς / Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης: ένας Ρωμιός

Cosmas Megalommatis, Shamash: World Mythology-1989

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Σαμάς: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία, Ελληνική Εκπαιδευτική Εγκυκλοπαίδεια, 1989

Кузьма Мегаломматис, Шамаш: мировая мифология, Греческая педагогическая энциклопедия, 1989

Kosmas Megalommatis, Šamaš (oder Schamasch): Weltmythologie, Griechische Pädagogische Enzyklopädie, 1989

Kosmas Gözübüyükoğlu, Şamaş: Dünya Mitolojisi, Yunan Pedagoji Ansiklopedisi, 1989

قزمان ميغالوماتيس، شمش : اساطیر جهانی، دایره المعارف آموزشی یونانی، 1989

Côme Megalommatis, Shamash: Mythologie mondiale, Encyclopédie pédagogique grecque, 1989

1989 قزمان ميغالوماتيس، شمش : الأساطير العالمية، الموسوعة التربوية اليونانية،

Cosimo Megalommatis, Šamaš: mitologia mondiale, Enciclopedia pedagogica greca, 1989

Cosimo Megalommatis, Shamash: mitología mundial, Enciclopedia pedagógica griega, 1989

===============

Скачать PDF-файл: / PDF-Datei herunterladen: / Télécharger le fichier PDF : / PDF dosyasını indirin: / :PDF قم بتنزيل ملف / Download PDF file: / : یک فایل دانلود کنید / Κατεβάστε το PDF:

calameo.com

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Σαμάς: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία - 1989

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Σαμάς: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία, Ελληνική Εκπαιδευτική Εγκυκλοπαίδεια, 1989 Кузьма Мегаломматис, Шамаш: мировая мифология, Г

docdroid.net

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Σαμάς.pdf

Ztuyro. oro x6porou qu€m oliY(pouon,. prvo0Forum Flomanum,t|€@lqFoiv ouFe ronxd or yuwi(ae trou eixov (pqrnget sq Pdlp} 610l or toBivor yivo

figshare

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Σαμάς: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία - 1989

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Σαμάς: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία, Ελληνική Εκπαιδευτική Εγκυκλοπαίδεια, 1989Кузьма Мегаломматис, Шамаш: мировая мифология, Гр

slideshare.net

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Σαμάς: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία - 1989

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Σαμάς: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία - 1989 - Download as a PDF or view online for free

Iran, Achaemenid ornamental Lapis lazuli plate with a winged bull

The verso of the Narmer Palette. Narmer, considered by many Egyptologists to be the first ruler of a unified Egypt, stands over a defeated foe and is about to bring his mace down on the foe's head. Narmer is shown here wearing the white crown (hedyet) of Lower Egypt, while on the recto he is depicted with the red crown (desheret) of Upper Egypt, perhaps symbolizing his unification of the two realms. Artist unknown; sculpted ca. 3200-3000 BCE. Found at Hierakonpolis (Nekhen), pre-unification capital of Upper Egypt; now in the Egyptian Museum, Cairo. Photo credit: Heagy1/Wikimedia Commons.

Plea for Jean Baptiste Duroselle's Brilliant Book, Europe: A History of its Peoples

The famous French academician Jean Baptiste Duroselle was commissioned by the Commission of the European Union (European Communities at the time) and Jacques Delors personally to author a European History of Europe, which would justify the establishment of the European Union in the 2nd half of the 20th c. as the crown of all earlier efforts to establish one state across the continent. The book was written in French (L'Europe: histoire de ses peuples, Paris, Perrin, 1990, 708 p.) and it was geared to become (as it really did) the basic textbook of European History for the secondary education of all EU member states. For this reason, numerous translations were produced at the local level, and the book became in this manner the cornerstone of the European identity; as regards countries that were not member-states in 1990 but became later, the book was translated to the official language(s) of each country after its adhesion.

As one could anticipate, the chauvinist, racist, and bogus-European state of Greece made the exception.

Slavs taken for Greeks

Being produced by the colonial powers of France and England as a pseudo-state-tool for Western European schemes against the Ottoman Empire, 'Greece' became for the first time in World History the name of a state, following the treaties of Edirne / Adrianople in 1829 and the London Protocol in 1830. In the past, 'Greek' ('Hellene') was a most pejorative term for more than 1100 years of Christian Roman and Eastern Roman rule (330-1453), whereas 'Greece' was used as a merely geographical term for this marginal and otherwise useless province which was the final receptacle of the 6th c. CE cataclysmic Slavic influx that put an irrevocable end to the existence of the Greek-speaking people in South Balkans. Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitus wrote about this fact, but the pseudo-historians of today's racist Greek state get their salaries as fake professors in order to discredit this highly intellectual emperor!

Confession of the Ancient Greek Nothingness

Even before the Christianization of the Roman Empire, the famous Edict of Caracalla (Constitutio Antoniniana; 212 CE) made it clear that there were no 'Greeks' except as a linguistic particularity within the Roman Empire; by unconditionally accepting to become citizens of the Roman Empire, all the Greek speaking people in the Balkans (south of Macedonia), in Anatolia (Asia Minor), and elsewhere admitted that there was no Greek intellectual, ideological, imperial or political, socio-behavioral and state identity. Before the Roman invasion and the subsequent unification of all lands around the Mediterranean, 'Greece' was simply a geographical term denoting lands south of Macedonia and Illyria; but there was no ethnic, tribal, linguistic, intellectual, spiritual, religious -let alone governmental- unity. That is why they were killing one another like flies; and their low level historiographers, who never attained the due spiritual and imperial level initiation to become proper, impersonal and objective, imperial scribes, wrote their nonsense (like Thucydides) uselessly expanding on civil wars – which further proliferated hatred, rancor, strife, enmity and wars among those wretched populations. 

Alexander's Capital was Babylon, not Pella, not Athens!

Only two foreign kings, Philip II of Macedon and his son and successor Alexander, invaded and imposed temporary order on those chaotic elements. But Alexander despised all things Greek, and that's why he chose Babylon as capital and the Sogdian princess Roxanne as wife, after he substituted himself to Darius III, thus becoming the Shah of the Iranian Empire.

Colonial flattery and imperial promises to South Balkan vagabonds

Now, the situation was even worse in the South Balkan confines in 1821-1828, because not even a droplet of Ancient Greek blood could be found in the veins of the local populations of Slavic, Albanian, Turkish, Vlachic, and other origin; they were speaking numerous different languages and the only means of communication among them was Ottoman Turkish. To those misfortunate populations the criminal colonial gangsters, after posturing as 'Philhellenes' and narrating cheap flimflam for idiots, sold the fallacy of a supposedly glorious past of which that wretched populace would be the hypothetical offspring.

Fake Modern Greek language to support Pseudo-Greek Racism

Believing the viciously constructed pseudo-myth of Hellenism, those populations were forced to learn a prefabricated (by the France-based Adamantios Korais) idiom (which was imposed in the schools in a dictatorial and genocidal manner) and were fooled for two consecutive centuries, being incessantly told paranoid lies about the so-called splendor of the fictional Ancient Greeks who 'had civilized the world'. This turned the execrably miserable and ethnically bastard pseudo-nation to exorbitantly arrogant braggarts whose lives depend on ceaselessly and hysterically deprecating all the other, neighboring or not, nations (notably the Macedonians, the Bulgarians, the Albanians, the Turks, and the Iranians) as culturally 'lower' people – whose ancestors were (hypothetically again) 'civilized' by the ancestors of today's Greeks!!!

Today's Greece is indeed the racist state par excellence.

Then, Jean Baptiste Duroselle came!  

With his superb book, Duroselle quasi-automatically ridiculed all the clowns of the Greek bogus-universities (still today, it is prohibited to establish a private university in pseudo-democratic, crypto-totalitarian Greece) whereby ignorant historians, idiotic archaeologists, nonsensical political scientists, clownish Hellenists, and absolutely charlatanesque Byzantinologists (sic!) work (or perform if you like) - not to carry out true, genuine research but to subserviently support the criminal, racist dogma of Hellenism, which is the worst form of Nazism that has ever existed.

The chauvinist pseudo-Greek mob's anger against Duroselle

Then, in 1990, due to the EU demand for a Greek translation of Duroselle's book, all the mental sewerage of the uneducated, ignorant and decrepit Greek mob flooded the mass media spreading unprecedented insults against Duroselle, EU, Europe, European universities and … the rest of the world! The intellectually felonious, academically malodorous, and mentally pathetic professors of universities and academicians of Greece either kept silent or sided with the mob to become more popular as supposedly defending the 'rights' of the 'Greek' nation. This situation testifies to a well-concealed reality; the fake Greeks of the last two centuries, who are in reality a defaced populace deprived of their true Eastern Roman (not 'Byzantine') Orthodox identity, never felt as a 'European' nation. Their immense psychological complex of inferiority is therefore expressed every time a real event underscores that they are a second class, uneducated pseudo-country with no integrity, no discipline, no rule, no morals, and reason of existence.

The southeastern borders of Europe are those of Albania, Macedonia and Bulgaria.

I consider as my life's most outstanding achievement and most distinct honor that I defended Jean Baptiste Duroselle personally and his book and academic-intellectual approach against all those rascals (the mob and the Nazi elite and state of Greece), who found my 2800-word Plea for Jean Baptiste Duroselle's book as a good reason to insult me as well and to force me out.

The anti-Duroselle hysteria in Greece and the forthcoming end of Greece

The Plea was published in the Greek weekly Oikonomikos Tahydromos on the 7th February 1991, although it was written and sent on 30th August 1990. It generated more than 30 nonsensical, insulting and ridiculous responses from either biased academics (who wrote against me only to 'justify' the positions that they held without being properly qualified – which is the very common case in the meritless pseudo-state 'Greece') or uneducated mob that mistook the defense of the historical truth by me as personally insulting for them! Such is their depravity that they cannot realize that the only thing that they will finally achieve in this manner is the total nuclear annihilation of Greece.

About Jean-Baptiste Duroselle:   

About the book:

fayard.fr

"L'Europe - Histoire de ses peuples", Jean-Baptiste Duroselle

L'Europe d'aujourd'hui trouve ses racines dans le passé. Sans taire les différences nationales, sans omettre les guerres et les périodes de

Random samples of book reviews:

SAGE Journals

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

-----------------------------

Download the article in Word doc.:

megalommatiscomments

Plea for Jean Baptiste Duroselle’s Brilliant Book, Europe: A History of its Peoples

The famous French academician Jean Baptiste Duroselle was commissioned by the Commission of the European Union (European Communities at the

https://www.academia.edu/86600089/Plea_for_Jean_Baptiste_Duroselles_Brilliant_Book_Europe_A_History_of_its_Peoples

Το Ιράν των Αγιατολάχ: ένα Μασωνικό Παρασκεύασμα - αποκαλύπτει ο Έλληνας Ιρανολόγος καθ. Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης

Ayatollahs' Iran: A Freemasonic Fabrication, reveals the Greek Iranologist Prof. Mohammad Samsaddin Megalommatis

ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ”

Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 27η Σεπτεμβρίου 2018.

----------------------------

https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2018/09/27/το-ιράν-των-αγιατολάχ-ένα-μασωνικό-παρ/ =============================

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Ρωμιοσύνη, Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή Αυτοκρατορία

Αναδημοσιεύω εδώ ένα εντυπωσιακό άρθρο του Έλληνα ανατολιστή ιστορικού και πολιτικού επιστήμονα, καθ. Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτη, ο οποίος διαλύει πολλούς μύθους που υπάρχουν στην κοινή γνώμη σχετικά με το Ιράν ως τάχα ‘αντίπαλο’ της δυτικής Νέας Τάξης Πραγμάτων.

Αρχικά δημοσιευμένο το 2007, το ανατρεπτικό άρθρο αναδημοσιεύθηκε σε πολλά ιρανικά πόρταλς της Διασποράς επειδή οι Ιρανοί κατάλαβαν εύκολα το τι έλεγε για την χώρα τους ο εξαίρετος Έλληνας ιρανολόγος, ο οποίος έχει μελετήσει την ιστορία του Ιράν και έχει περιπλανηθεί στην χώρα εκείνη όσο ελάχιστοι άλλοι ειδικοί.

Ayatollahs’ Iran: a Nationalistic Theocracy as Freemasonic Machination

By M. Shamsaddin Megalommatis

Saturday 22 December 2007

http://www.fravahr.org/spip.php?article411

and https://www.academia.edu/24267250/Ayatollahs_Iran_a_Nationalistic_Theocracy_as_Freemasonic_Machination

======================

The current theocratic and utterly unrepresentative regime of Iran was not the choice of the peoples and nations of Iran. The events that triggered the fall of Shah and the return of Ayatollah Khomeini were all machinated by an Apostate Freemasonic Lodge that controls part of the French and the English establishments and through them part of the American establishment.

The danger that the late Shah of Iran represented for their eschatological plans was absolutely tremendous. This does not imply that they intended to help establish a pseudo-Shia theocracy in Iran; simply they were not able to completely control the developments. As a matter of fact, the late Shah intended to modernize, industrialize and westernize Iran in the 70s; one could compare his attempt to that of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk in Turkey, 50 years earlier.

A strong Iran next to a strong Turkey is enough to make the Anglo-French colonial establishments spend years without an easy sleep. Although this would look good for Western geo-political and geo-strategic interests, particularly in containing Tsarist Russia / USSR / Putin’s oligarchy, in real terms of Western Freemasonic conspiracy in the Middle East it is abominable because it would hinder all Freemasonic plans and projects for the Middle East, the area of their primary concern par excellence.

Mossadegh received by Truman

Mossadegh was a Freemason Islamist. His supporters became later the supporters of Khomeyni and founders of the Islamic regime.

It sounds awkward but it is absolutely real: the late Shah of Iran tried with a delay of 17 years (as of 1970) to implement the basic concepts of the Iranian nationalistic policies of Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh, a great Iranian statesman whom the Freemasonic mass media of the West did their ingenious best to defame and ridicule, while falsely portraying him as … related to the Iranian Communist party!

[In fact, Mohamad Mossadegh was himself a Freemason and an Islamist. His so-called nationalism was no more than an International-Islamism inspired by Freemasonry — Fravahr]

When Madeleine Albright, decades later, admitted that the Eisenhower administration was involved in the Operation Ajax that ended with the Mossadegh’s removal, she did not state any other reason except geopolitical considerations. In fact, these considerations were Freemasonic eschatological approaches to the Middle East, covered by English economic interests, and involved volumes of falsified information produced in order to mislead the gullible and deeply unaware American establishment — through use of pro-English agents who were active in Washington D.C.

The Shah himself must have felt in the early and mid 70s how right Mohammed Mossadegh was. In his last days in Tehran, the Shah must have also remembered his father’s last days in the throne, when in September 1941 the English had forced him to abdicate in favour of his young son, as they could not accept Iran’s neutrality in WW II.

The Freemasonic anti-Iranian conspiracy played on the Iranian peoples’ feelings against the Shah, and involved the return of Ayatollah Khomeini who had spent some months in France. In fact, the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge pushed to the political forefront Iranians who had already lived and studied in France where they had become Freemasons, like Mehdi Bazargan, Khomeini’s first Prime Minister, and Abolhassan Banisadr, the first Iranian President.

They were joined in their effort to canalize the Iranian Revolution by Sadegh Ghotbzadeh, who had studied in America, and had travelled with Ayatollah Khomeini from Paris to Tehran on February 1st 1979 to become later Foreign Minister (after Banisadr) and then be arrested and executed (September 1982) as betrayed by President George H. W. Bush. After 1983, Freemasonic influence on Iranian policies has been indirect.

Indirect manipulation involves the mental, spiritual, philosophical, ideological, and therefore political engulfment of the targeted establishment into erroneous perception of the present realities and the future targets of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge within a context that can be rather parallelized with an iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma.

Shia Eschatology in contrast with Freemasonic Messianism

Worship of Isis

Freemasonic ritual as on the walls of the Isiac Freemasonic Lodge (Temple of Isis) at Pompeii

The worship of Isis is depicted in this wall-painting from Herculaneum. The high priest stands at the entrance to the temple and looks down on the ceremony beneath him, which is supervised by priests with shaven heads. In the case of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the Freemasonic establishment’s arsenal reaches its limits. Drawing from a late Sassanid Zervanism that survived within Shia Islam since the early days of the Islamic conquest of Iran (636: Sassanid defeat at Qadisiyah, 641 Sassanid defeat at Nihavent, 651: arrival of Islamic armies at Merv in Central Asia), Shia Eschatology revolves around the prevalence of Time as determinant element in the Mystic History of the Mankind; this is utterly alien to Western Freemasonic dogmas and doctrines that draw from Late Antiquity’s Gnosticisms, Hermetism, and Messianic Isidism.

With Khomeini’s doctrine based on the termination of the Ghaybah (“Occultation”) of the Shia Islamic Twelfth Imam (the Shia version of the Messiah) by means of the Islamic Republic of Iran, we reach one step closer to what is called in Islam Al Yom al Ahar (“the End of Time”).

Despite the fact that Iran and most of the Islamic World are engulfed in ignorance and confusion due to the academic systems that Freemasonic Europe produced to facilitate the advent of the Freemasonic Messianic, namely the Hellenism, the Orientalism, the Pan-Arabism, and the (Sunni) Islamism, the Shia establishment of Iran, sticking to the completion of the work initiated by Ayatollah Khomeini, have little chance to be misguided and deceived.

Contrarily to the Freemasonic concept of a Horus — Messiah, creation of Isis (as Freemasonry is symbolized within the Freemasonic eschatological doctrine), a Zervan — Twelfth Imam hinges on the absorption of all into a New Aeon with little concern about an Elected People to be saved.

Contrarily to a Horus — Victorious King and Pacifier, the concept of Zervan — Twelfth Imam involves the liberation of every person from the negative energy therein encrusted through various ways; as Zervan Akarana promises a monstrous appearance, yet able to embody the Loftiest of the Divine, the Shia Islamic Twelfth Imam promises no peace and no return for any elected people, but heralds the miraculous transformation of the miserable into luminous sources in the present world (after Al Yom al Ahar) and the Hereafter (Al Yom al Qiyamah).

There is certainly a Manichaean influence on the late Sassanid Zervanism (and through this system on the Shia Islam) but the Western stern rejection of Manichaeism proliferated only confusion and dire practices among the Apostate Freemasons. In fact, the Freemasonic Apostasy is a repetition of an earlier Apostasy that took place in the Late Antiquity, and caused the disastrous descent into the Middle Ages.

Unable to transcend, the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge seems set for disastrous developments that will now cover the entire surface of the Earth. Determined to continue an evil process started by Napoleon and sped up by Edmund Allenby, the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge seems today unable to perceive the impending domino effect that will ensue from an attack on Iran. The Apostate Lodge machinated the Anglo-French colonialism in order to create a false and precarious Israel (for Jews, not Israelites), thus exterminate both Jews and Palestinians (after a supposed final peace), and then set up a true Israel able to accommodate the migrating — because of expected ominous natural phenomena — English, Irish, Scots, French, Belgian, Dutch, and Scandinavians (namely the true descendants of the Ten Tribes of Israel). That final Israel that would span between the rivers Euphrates (Assyria) and Nile (Egypt) may simply never come to existence because of the rise of a New Era for the Middle East triggered by an attack on Iran.

The Advent of the End of Time

If Ahmadinejad referred to Mahdi’s advent (which means automatically the End of Time) already in his first speech at the UN (in September 2005), what happened meanwhile that indicates that by now an apocalyptic scenario would follow an American attack on Iran? Why what could happen in March 2006 should not occur in December 2007?

The answer to such a question is at the same time a full response to a great number of eschatological interpretations. The History of the Mankind can also be viewed as a History of missed opportunities. More recently, after 2001, to give an example, the US could have pacified Iraq, if they had the knowledge and the courage to do what it would take. Simply, they were either unaware or misled. Usually, to know how a solution can be found to a historical — political problem, one has to transcend; this mainly means that one has to see the problem in question as a non-problem, or place it within wider frame, or view it through different standpoints, or apply all these methods. Basically, a historical — political problem’s solution involves the non-consideration of a part’s interests.

An answer to the aforementioned question is at the same time a complete rejection of numerous approaches to historical texts of eschatological contents. As a matter of fact, there has always been a vast interpretational literature of the Prophetic books of the Bible, of the Revelation, of the Apocalyptic Hadith, and of the eschatological traditions of various peoples from India to Mexico. With the inception of the web, and the rise of spiritual interest in a post-Communist world, the interpretational interest only multiplied. Specifications and clarifications about the time of the arrival of Mahdi, the Messiah, Jesus as Islamic Prophet, Jesus as Christ of the Christian religion, etc. can be found in great number.

All these approaches emanate from a world plunged into the swamp of Time, a world whereby all people take for granted that Time exists. Yet, the Mankind existed for several thousands of years without shaping the concept of Time. For many great thinkers and wise elders in Sumer, Akkad, Egypt, Assyria and Babylon, Hittite Anatolia, and Biblical Israel, Time simply did not exist. The interaction of Being and Becoming was perceived completely differently, particularly by peoples who used the same word for “day” and “time” (e.g. umu in Assyrian — Babylonian). In a world viewed, perceived, sensed, and experienced diachronically, there is little place for fanaticism and empathy, as all reflect an eternal recapitulation of everything.

In that world, great diachronic (and therefore apocalyptic and eschatological) Epics were compiled for a first and original occasion, and their elements, data, concepts and details were later diffused among later epics, mythical texts and apocalyptic literature. As a matter of fact, there is nothing original that was not already said before Moses. To give an example, it is sheer ignorance for anyone to believe that the concept of the Antichrist goes as back as the Revelation and Daniel.

More than 1500 years before the Revelation, for the Anatolian Hittites the Antichrist (Ullikummi) would rise from the Sea. The author of the Revelation reassessed the same topic, adding only an effort of identification of the Messiah (Tasmisu for the Ancient Hittites — Jesus as Christ for the Christians). More than 2000 years before Isaiah, the concept of the Messiah existed in the Egyptian Heliopolitan Doctrine.

Viewing the present world through the eyes of an Egyptian, Assyrian or Hittite erudite scholar would offer a completely different perspective, and certainly more authoritative as emanating from a diachronic consideration of the Mankind’s and the World’s existence. In most of the cases, this was avoided because of the salacity of Western Orientalists, who instead of serving truth, did promote preconceived ideas either of Freemasonic or Christian Catholic nature. What would destroy pillars of their false faiths had to be covered by silence; this is the “veracity” of the Western universities’ professors.

2007: A Changed World and Iran

In fact, many things have changed over the past 21 months; they are not easily visible to average people and supposed leaders. Even worse, it seems that they are not ostensible to panicked establishments and elites either.

Losing a unique opportunity to be the sole superpower and thus accomplish the wishes of the Founding Fathers, the US will have to become familiar with the reality of a multi-polar world.

If we exclude the nonsensical nuclear mutual destruction, which will be always a possibility, as long as nuclear weapons exist, America’s interests can be hit at any moment. America lost considerably because America allied itself with the only country they should never work together: England.

Discrediting America, exposing the US, while mobilizing others’ forces to contain America and finally avert a long perspective Pax Americana, England convinced the US leadership to pursue the only way that can truly damage the US interests: action against the Moral Principles that the Founding Fathers stipulated so clearly for the then young and promising, Anti-Colonial, nation that would diffuse Freedom, Justice and Democracy to the rest of the world.

The US leadership failed to assess that it would be detrimental to pursue after 1991 immoral practices employed at the times of the Cold War. The policy of double standards (two measures and two weights) would convince all possible adversaries that the US represents a threat, and would mobilize many against America. The enumeration could be very long.

Vice-president Cheney’s trip to Saudi Arabia in November 2006 was certainly taken very seriously by the Iranians — within eschatological context, I mean. The Islamic Messiah will certainly exterminate a cursed, Satanic regime in charge of Haramayn, the two holy cities of Mekka and Madinah.

One would not ask America to believe the Islamic eschatological literature; but one would anticipate America to take it into account, and shape its policy accordingly. The rest is just inane.

Saudi Arabia cannot exist — if Israel is to survive!

It was a pathetic American effort to continue English Colonial policies of division and strife in the Middle East; these policies targeting the existence of the Ottoman Empire and Imperial Iran, if pursued by America, against Turkey and Iran, can guarantee the total disaster of America.

Yet, Prof. Huntington, in a moment of truth, exposed the truth plainly, when he attributed the Islamic Extremism and Terrorism to the lack of a core State for the Muslim world. This was precisely the work of the Anglo-French Apostate Freemasonic Lodge that we already mentioned. America should not be confused with the Anglo-French secondary conflicts, as highlighted by the San Remo arguments between Clemenceau and Lloyd George.

For America’s interests to prevail, for the present state of Israel to survive, for a solution of the quasi-permanent Palestinian problem to be found, America should avoid any direct interference in the affairs of the Muslim World.

Any US attack against Iran would trigger an unexpected and unsuspected reaction that would certainly have a lot to do with Islamic eschatological expectations.

The explosion would immediately bring in other, sizeable, non-Islamic countries that are ready for a severe collapse of the present global economic structures, as their economies are better suited for barter trade. These countries would not necessarily help Iran militarily; they would simply make impossible for America to sustain the cost of a conflict spanning from Yemen and Israel to Afghanistan and Pakistan, at a moment Saudi and Emirati oilfields would not be anymore functional.

America should keep itself outside the Muslim World, and following the instructions of Prof. Huntington, help (with the cooperation of Israel) the rise of a core Muslim country in the Middle East that would eradicate the nefarious colonial deeds of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge.

This country should be a secular and humanist, democratic country that would be committed to the elimination of Pan-Arabism and Islamic Extremism. To support the rise of a vast Oriental State, America should fervently oppose France and England.

This would redraw the map of the Middle East, but ultimately save the present state Israel, offer peace to the Palestinians, and grant concord to the other Middle Eastern countries. Only a vast Oriental State would have no problem in containing Iran and outmanoeuvring the Ayatollah regime.

Otherwise the Death will hit America — in an irrevocable and precipitated way.

Europe would be affected too; and that Apostate Freemasonic Lodge would be severely persecuted in a new — unrecognizable — Europe ruled by a new Iron Man of the North.

---------------------------------

Κατεβάστε την αναδημοσίευση σε Word doc.:

https://www.slideshare.net/MuhammadShamsaddinMe/ss-250701066

https://issuu.com/megalommatis/docs/iran_of_the_ayatullahs.docx

https://vk.com/doc429864789_621631094

https://www.docdroid.net/HEpNSXC/to-iran-ton-aghiatolakh-ena-masoniko-paraskeuasma-docx

The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek 'Historians': the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis

In a previous article published under the title 'Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World’s Fake History & Rotten Foundations, and Prof. Jin Canrong’s Astute Comments', I wholeheartedly supported the position taken by the prominent Chinese Prof. Jin Canrong about Aristotle and I explained why Aristotle never existed as he is known today and most of his texts were not written by him, but by the pseudo-Christian Benedictine monks of Western Europe for the purpose of the ferocious imperial and theological battle that Rome carried out against New Rome-Constantinople and the Eastern Roman Empire. You can find the table of contents and a link to the publication at the end of the present article.   

Contents

Introduction

I. A fictional concept: the origin of the fraud

II. A construct based on posterior textual sources

III. The deceitful presentation

IV. 5th century BCE texts found in 15th c. CE manuscripts do not make 'History'.

V. Abundant evidence of lies and deliberate distortions attested in the manuscript transmission

VI. Darius I the Great, the Behistun inscription, and Ctesias

VII. The historical Assyrian Queen Shammuramat and the fictional Queen Semiramis of the 'Ancient Greek sources'

VIII. The malignant intentions of the Benedictine liars: from the historical Darius I the Great to the fictional Semiramis

IX. The vicious distortions of the Benedictine liars: from Ctesias to Herodotus

The Behistun inscription

Introduction

In the present article, I will offer a typical example of text falsification carried out by the Catholic monks, who did not 'copy and preserve' manuscripts of ancient Greek and Latin texts, as it has been mendaciously said by Western European and North American academics and lying scholars, but they purposefully falsified, distorted, concealed, destroyed and/or contrived numerous texts.

This enormous forgery took place in Western Europe between the 2nd half of the 8th century and the 1st half of the 15th century; the colonial era was launched exactly afterwards. For this reason, few manuscripts with Ancient Greek and Roman texts date before the 8th c.; in fact, most of them have been either distorted and replaced or hidden in the vast libraries still owned, controlled and administered that the anti-Christian Roman Catholic Church.

The purpose of this devious and evil effort was the fabrication of a fake narrative about the forged antiquity and the supposed importance of the Western Europeans according to the needs of world conquest, prevalence and preponderance of the pseudo-Christian Roman Catholic Church; this bogus-historical dogma, as direct opposition to and ultimate rejection of Orthodox Christianity, would be initially imposed as the 'scientific discipline of History' in Western Europe and subsequently projected onto the rest of the world by means of colonial invasion, indigenous identity destruction, moral integrity demolition, cultural heritage disintegration, educational subordination, economic exploitation, military subjugation, and socio-political domination.  

In other words, the monastical scribes and copyists created an entirely fake Euro-centric past, which became the rotten foundation of Western Europe. This fallacy became known as Judeo-Christian world and Greco-Roman civilization. However, the decipherment of ancient languages (Egyptian hieroglyphic, Old Achaemenid Iranian, Assyrian-Babylonian, Sumerian, Hurrian, Hittite, Urartu, Ugaritic, etc) and the study of millions of original texts, which were not copies of earlier sources but contemporaneous to the events that they narrated, sounded the death knell of the era of history fabrication programs.

With the post-Soviet rise of the great continental powers (China, India, Russia, etc.), the economic-military-political-ideological-educational-academic-cultural tyranny of the Western World started being overthrown throughout the earlier colonized world. The historical forgery that the colonial rulers imposed collapsed, the falsehood of the Eurocentric dogma of World History started being revealed and rejected, and an overwhelming project of total de-Westernization appeared as a prerequisite for the liberation of the Mankind from the lies of the European Renaissance, the Western Humanities, the White Supremacism, the Western European colonialism and racism, as well as from the falsehood of numerous subsystems of the construct, such as Classicism, Hellenism, Orientalism, etc.  

In our days, it is imperative for anti-colonial scholars to unveil the distortions applied to Ancient Greek and Latin texts by the medieval monks. Consequently, historians from all over the world have to work together in order to denounce and obliterate the Western fraud and the fake History of the Western Man, which consists in arbitrarily taking 14th c. CE manuscripts as authentic narratives of Ancient History.

I. A fictional concept: the origin of the fraud

Apparently, the present brief article cannot be an exhaustive presentation of the Western fraud, and of the historical forgery that the Western monks, manuscript copyists, collectors, academics and propagandists attempted to impose worldwide through colonial conquests, massacres and tyrannies. However, I can still enumerate the major founding myths of the Western World.

Two thematic circles of historical distortions and fraudulent claims made by the Western academia revolve around the following two entirely fabricated entities, which have conventionally but erroneously been called

a) "the Greco-Roman world" and

b) "Biblical Israel" and "Judeo-Christian civilization".

These ahistorical entities never existed. The original concept of those notions is purely fictional, and it therefore remains always unquestioned in the fraudulent Western universities. In this regard, the sources that the Western academics evoke to support their claims are posterior, untrustworthy, forged and therefore worthless.

At times, some of those texts represent merely ancient authors' misperceptions of earlier texts and authors; however, more often, the ancient texts have been tampered with. On other occasions, ancient texts that refute the lies of other historical sources are hidden from the general public and conventionally discussed among the Western academic accomplices.  

II. A construct based on posterior textual sources

The entire construct hinges on the deceitful presentation of several types of material forged, collected, concealed, interpreted, contextualized, narrated, repeatedly but intentionally discussed, supposedly questioned, and selectively popularized; this was due to the fact that the said material was incessantly utilized for the colonial needs and targets of the Western European powers (England, France, Holland, Spain, Portugal, and more recently the US). In fact, the Western World's fake History was created as the ultimate support of all colonial claims.

This process happened within a system in which posterior textual sources (preserved in medieval manuscripts) have occupied the central position, whereas the ancient epigraphic material, which was contemporaneous to the historical events under study, has been deliberately disregarded.

All later discovered data and pieces of information were either adjusted to the construct or methodically hidden; this is how the original concept, pathetically believed almost as a religious dogma, remained totally unchallenged down to our days.

III. The deceitful presentation

The quintessence of the deceitful presentation involves a vicious trick; people (pupils and students, but also scholars and intellectuals, as well as the general public) are taught and made accustomed to care mainly about the absolutely insignificant dates of birth and death of historical persons (authors, rulers, etc.), and not about the dates of the manuscripts in which these individuals are mentioned as supposed authors; this situation turns readers, students and scholars into pathetic idiots. 

Subsequently, we cannot seriously afford to describe Herodotus as a 5th c. BCE writer, because there is no manuscript with texts attributed to him, dating before the 10th c. CE. In addition, if we take into account the enormous number of other ancient authors decrying, denigrating and rejecting Herodotus' absurdities and malignancy, we have to permanently and irrevocably obliterate Herodotus from the History of Mankind and consider his false, paranoid and racist texts as a double Crime against the Mankind:

first, with respect to the original narrative (to which we don't have access as it was distorted by medieval monastical scribes and copyists) because the author attempted to disparage the superior Iranian civilization and the majestic Achaemenid universalist empire, while undeservedly praising the South Balkan barbarians, and

second, as regards the currently available text, which was forged as per the discriminatory intentions of the monks who altered and distorted it in their effort to fabricate the fake, modern divide (or dichotomy) East-West, and to offer a shred of historicity to it.

IV. 5th century BCE texts found in 15th c.  CE manuscripts do not make 'History'.

People get therefore addicted to considering as a true and original 'work' (of an ancient author) the manuscript (or manuscripts) in which the specific treatise, essay or book was copied perhaps 10 or 15 centuries after the author composed it. Due to a long chain of intermediaries (namely library copyists, librarians, scholars, monks, collectors, purchasers and/or statesmen), the transmitted text may have been partly or totally changed.

There is absolutely no guarantee as regards the honesty, the good intentions, the unbiased attitude, and the benevolent character of the perhaps 5, 10, 20 or 50 persons who -living in different eras and without knowing one another- may have constituted the chain of (unknown to us) intermediaries between the hand of the author and that of the last copyist whose manuscript was preserved down to our times.

Example: very little matters today whether the ancient author Diodorus Siculus or Siceliotes (西西里的狄奧多羅斯) actually lived in the 1st c. BCE or in the 3rd c. CE; quite contrarily, what is important for history-writing is the fact that the earliest known manuscript of his famous 'Bibliotheca Historica' (世界史) dates back to the 10th c. CE.

Consequently, the first piece of information that should be stated after the name of any 'ancient' Anatolian, Macedonian, Thracian, Greek, Roman and other author is the date of the earliest extant manuscript of his works.

V. Abundant evidence of lies and deliberate distortions attested in the manuscript transmission

An extraordinarily high number of original sources excavated in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Anatolia, Canaan, Iran and elsewhere, and subsequently deciphered, can be dated with accuracy; example: the Annals of great Assyrian emperor Tiglath-pileser III (745-727 BCE) were written during his reign. They are contemporaneous and therefore original.

However, in striking contrast to them, almost all the manuscripts with the works of ancient Greek and Roman authors whose texts have formed the backbone of the fraudulent historical dogma of the Western academia are not contemporaneous but posterior by, at times, 1500 or 2000 years.

Even worse, numerous ancient Greek authors' texts were not preserved through a manuscript tradition at all; they were saved as references in posterior authors' works. This concerns, for instance, Ctesias (克特西亞斯), an Ancient Carian (Anatolian) physician and erudite scholar, who lived and worked in the court of the Achaemenid Iranian emperor Artaxerxes II in the 5th c. BCE.

Later, willing to offer potential guidebooks to Iran and India for the use of various peripheral peoples and tribes of the Balkan region, Ctesias elaborated in Ancient Ionian (愛奧尼亞希臘語) two treatises to describe the state of things in Iran and in India. To the Western academic bibliography, his works are known (in Latin) as 'Persica' and 'Indica'.

These texts were not saved integrally in manuscripts copied for the purpose of preserving Ctesias' works, but they were preserved in Diodorus Siculus' 'Bibliotheca Historica'. Although he is not known through authentic and contemporaneous Iranian sources, we can deduce that Ctesias certainly spoke fluently the official language of the Empire and read Old Achaemenid cuneiform. Eventually, he may have also studied and learned Babylonian and Elamite cuneiform, namely two ancient Mesopotamian cuneiform languages and writings the use of which was maintained by Iranian scribes.

Apparently, Ctesias had a firsthand insight, as he lived for many years in Parsa (Persepolis), the capital of the Achaemenid Empire and he also traveled extensively along with the Iranian emperor. But, unfortunately, the following ordeal was produced.  

VI. Darius I the Great, the Behistun inscription, and Ctesias

One century before Ctesias served Artaxerxes II, the empire of Iran was saved by Darius I the Great (大流士一世; reign: 522-486), who overthrew a usurper, namely the Mithraic (密特拉教祭司) magus Gaumata (高墨达), and by so doing, preserved on the throne a dynasty of faithful Zoroastrian (瑣羅亞斯德教徒) monarchs.

To commemorate his great victory and the consolidation of the his dynasty, Darius I the Great had an enormous rock relief and a monumental inscription (貝希斯敦銘文) engraved on the rocks of Mount Behistun (貝希斯頓山), at a distance of 150 km west of Hamadan (哈马丹; Ekbatana/埃克巴坦那) in Western Iran (15 m high by 25 m wide and 100 m up the cliff). As it can be easily understood, these events occurred after the assassination of Cambyses, at the very beginning of Darius I the Great's reign.

It goes without saying that the successors of Darius I the Great and the imperial Iranian administration knew perfectly well the historical details and were fully aware of the imperial inscription that immortalized the event, which had obviously become the cornerstone of the imperial education.    

VII. The historical Assyrian Queen Shammuramat and the fictional Queen Semiramis of the 'Ancient Greek sources'

However, one century later, when Ctesias lived in Iran, served the Iranian Emperor, and spoke Old Achaemenid Iranian (and if not, he was surrounded by the Empire's top interpreters and advisers), something disastrously odd 'happened'.

According to Diodorus Siculus, who explicitly stated that he extensively quoted from Ctesias' text (Bibliotheca Historica, II 13), the imperial Carian physician and author appears to have attributed the Behistun inscription and the rock reliefs to none else than the Assyrian Queen Shammuramat (薩穆-拉瑪特), who was the queen consort of the Assyrian Emperor Shamshi Adad V (沙姆什·阿達德五世; reign: 824-811) and co-regent (811-805) during the first years of reign of her son Adad Nirari III (阿达德尼拉里三世; reign: 811-783)!

Furthermore, in the 'Ancient Greek' text of Diodorus Siculus, the monumental inscription was said to be written in Assyrian cuneiform (Συρίοις γράμμασιν)! Even worse, in the same text (as preserved today), it was also stated that, in the rock relief, there was also a representation of the Assyrian queen!

Ctesias' text, as preserved by Diodorus Siculus, is truly abundant in information, but it is historically impossible and therefore entirely forged. Due to this and many other texts, an enormous chasm was unnecessarily formed between

a) the historical queen Shammuramat of Assyria, whose historicity is firmly undeniable, due to the existence of several contemporaneous cuneiform sources excavated in Assyria, and subsequently deciphered and published,

and

b) the purely fictional Assyrian queen Semiramis (沙米拉姆) of the posterior Ancient Greek textual sources that were supposedly 'preserved' (but in reality deliberately distorted and forged) in the Benedictine manuscripts of Western Europe's monasteries.

However, if we examine closely the facts, we will surely understand what truly occurred in this case; then, we will be able to fathom how the fake History of the Western world was fabricated.

The Behistun inscription is trilingual, as it was written in Old Achaemenid Iranian (the earliest form of written Iranian languages), Babylonian, and Elamite; this was a very common practice during the Achaemenid times (550-330 BCE). The main figure of the associated rock relief is Darius I the Great, evidently the representation of a male royal.

One way or another, with respect to the Behistun inscription and rock relief, Ctesias certainly knew everything that we know today after the successive decipherments of the Old Achaemenid, Babylonian and Elamite cuneiform writings, or perhaps even more, due to the then extant oral tradition.

VIII. The malignant intentions of the Benedictine liars: from the historical Darius I the Great to the fictional Semiramis  

The Behistun inscription is not Assyrian; the representation is not that of female royal; and the monument is totally unrelated to Shammuramat, who had lived 300 years before Darius I the Great and 400 years before Artaxerxes II's physician Ctesias. More importantly, by that time, the Assyrian Empire did not occupy the lands surrounding Behistun. Accompanied by Iranian imperial officers and his associates, Ctesias certainly learned all the details of the monumental inscription that we can now read in articles, courses, lectures, books and encyclopedias.

The narrative was a triumph for Darius I the Great and a spectacular rebuttal of the vicious Mithraic Magi who had supported the defeated evil sorcerer and villain Gaumata. Apparently, writing a guidebook for Iran to help marginal people of the Empire's Balkan periphery, Ctesias did not have any reason to say lies. Moreover, we don't have any reason to believe that Diodorus Siculus needed to distort the truth to that extent, when copying and thus preserving Ctesias' masterpiece for the posterity.

However, the transmission of the details about the Behistun inscription embarrassed the Benedictine copyists who wanted to denigrate Darius I the Great and to portray his great empire in a most derogatory manner. They had already proceeded in this manner, distorting other manuscripts, forging texts, and fabricating their pseudo-historical narratives at will.

That is why Ctesias' pertinent text, which had certainly been preserved in its original form within Diodorus Siculus' Bibliotheca Historica, was intentionally distorted by the Benedictine 'Holy Inquisition of Libraries', which fabricated the myths of today's Western world some time after the middle of the 8th c. CE. To be accurate, Ctesias' historical description was entirely replaced by a fictional and historically nonsensical account.

The unbelievable lies -invented and included in Diodorus Siculus' quotations from Ctesias- risked making of the fictional queen Semiramis a world ruler! Whereas the Assyrian Empire at the end of the 9th c. BCE did not control even the western half of today's Iranian territory, the unequivocally mythicized Semiramis had supposedly sent her armies up to India where those fictitious Assyrian soldiers were trampled by the elephants. This worthless narrative that replaced Ctesias' original text may very well have been invented as a 'historical' excuse for Alexander the Great's failure to advance deep inside India.

IX. The vicious distortions of the Benedictine liars: from Ctesias to Herodotus

But if the fictional Semiramis' Indian campaign is entirely false, so are then the preposterous narratives of Herodotus about Darius I the Great's and Xerxes I the Great's campaigns in the insignificant and barbarian circumference of South Balkans. These texts involved evil purposes, heinous anti-Iranian biases, fictional battles, racist discourses, vicious lies, incredibly large number of the Iranian armies, and absurdly high number of Iranian casualties.

The mendacious but idiotic Benedictine monks, who wrote those slander tales did not apparently expect that, sometime in the future, excavations would bring to light splendid Iranian antiquities, original cuneiform documentation, and trustworthy contemporaneous historical sources, whereas a systematic effort of decipherment would offer to people all over the world direct access to historical texts written in dead languages, thus irrevocably canceling Herodotus' nonsensical report and, even more importantly, the later distortions that the Benedictine monks made on their worthless manuscripts.

In any case, had those fictional campaigns against 'Greece' had a shred of truth to them, they would have certainly been documented one way or another in various Old Achaemenid, Babylonian, Elamite, Imperial Aramaic, Egyptian hieroglyphic or other sources; but they were not.

Even worse, the meaningless and ludicrous battles of Marathon, Thermopylae, Salamis, and their likes would have been commemorated by the Seleucids, the Ptolemies, and the Attalids all the way down to the Romans and the Eastern Romans. But we know quite well that the nonexistent, fictional past of the so-called Ancient Greek world was absolutely irrelevant to them: precisely because it had not yet been fabricated.

===================  

Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World’s Fake History & Rotten Foundations, and Prof. Jin Canrong’s Astute Comments

academia.edu

Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World's Fake History & Rotten Foundations, and Prof. Jin Canrong's Astute Comments

亞里斯多德作為歷史偽造品，西方世界的虛假歷史和腐爛的基礎，金灿荣和他敏銳的評論 Аристотель как историческая подделка, фальшивая история и гнилые основы западного мира, и проницател

Contents

I. Aristotle: a Major Founding Myth of the Western World

II. When, where and by whom was the Myth of Aristotle fabricated?

III. The Myth of Aristotle and its first Byproducts: Scholasticism, East-West Schism, the Crusades & the Sack of Constantinople (1204)

IV. Aristotelization: First Stage of the Westernization and the Colonization of the World

V. Aristotelization as Foundation of all the Western Forgeries: the so-called Judeo-Christian Heritage and the Fraud of Greco-Roman Civilization

VI. The Modern Western World as Disruption of History

VII. The Myth of Aristotle and the Monstrosity of Western Colonialism 

======================

Download the article in PDF:

megalommatiscomments

The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis

In a previous article published under the title ‘Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World’s Fake History & Rotten Foundations, and

academia.edu

The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek 'Historians': the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis

In a previous article published under the title 'Aristotle as Historical Forgery, the Western World’s Fake History & Rotten Foundations, and

4shared.com

4shared.com - free file sharing and storage - Document Preview - text

Download The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek 'Historians' the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis

linkedin.com

Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis on LinkedIn: The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’

The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis Content

calameo.com

The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek 'Historians': the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis

Contents Introduction I. A fictional concept: the origin of the fraud II. A construct based on posterior textual sources III. The deceitful

figshare

The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis

ContentsIntroductionI. A fictional concept: the origin of the fraudII. A construct based on posterior textual sourcesIII. The deceitful pres

SlideShare

The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis

The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek ‘Historians’: the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis - Downl

Patreon

The Fake Texts of Ancient Greek 'Historians': the Behistun Inscription, Ctesias, Diodorus Siculus, Darius I the Great, and Semiramis | Megal

Get more from Megalommatis on Patreon

Έφεσος, Τουρκία, Ελλάδα, Ψευτοϊστορία, και Μισαλλοδοξία: με Τρομοκράτηση του Μέσου Έλληνα τα ΜΜΕ προετοιμάζουν Εθνική Συρρίκνωση

Ephesus, Turkey, Greece, False History, and Intolerance: by terrifying the average Greek, Greece's Mass Media sets the Stage for National Disaster

ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ”

Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 28η Απριλίου 2018.

Σε αντιπαράθεση με διαφωνούντα αναγνώστη του, ο κ. Μπαϋρακτάρης αναπαράγει πλήθος στοιχείων παλαιοτέρων δημοσιεύσεών μου και συζητήσεών μας, πιστά ακολουθώντας την ερμηνευτική προσέγγιση και το πρότυπο ιστορικής-πολιτισμικής σύνθεσης, τα οποία έχω εισαγάγει. Και έτσι, πολύ ορθά καταλήγει στο συμπέρασμα ότι σήμερα ανήκει εξολοκλήρου στην Τουρκία η πολιτισμική κληρονομιά της Εφέσου - αρχικά γνωστής ως Άπασα χάρη σε χιττιτικά κείμενα της 2ης χιλιετίας τα οποία αγνοούνται ολότελα από την αμόρφωτη, άξεστη, περιθωριακή και ρατσιστική ψευδο-πανεπιστημιακή ελίτ της Ελλάδας.

-------------------------------

https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2018/04/28/έφεσος-τουρκία-ελλάδα-ψευτοϊστορία-κ/ =================================

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Ρωμιοσύνη, Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή Αυτοκρατορία

Ό,τι ακολουθεί είναι ο διάλογος που έγινε με δύο σχολιαστές σχετικά με το σε ποιούς ανήκει η ιστορική, πολιτισμική κληρονομιά της χιττιτικής – ιωνικής (ελληνικής) – ρωμαϊκής – χριστιανορωμέϊκης Εφέσου.

Το βίντεο αφορούσε την Τροία αλλά ο διάλογος επεκτάθηκε στην Έφεσο και γενικώτερες ιστορικές θεωρήσεις.

“Μετά τους Σκοπιανούς & οι Τούρκοι επιχειρούν να παραχαράξουν την ελληνική ιστορία”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeXAUR9LcL0

Αντίκρουση κι απόρριψη του βίντεο έχει αναπτυχθεί εδώ:

Τροία, Τουρκία, Ελλάδα, Ψευτοϊστορία, κι η Αποβλάκωση του Μέσου Έλληνα από τα ΜΜΕ που προετοιμάζουν Εθνική Συρρίκνωση

https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2018/04/28/τροία-τουρκία-ελλάδα-ψευτοϊστορία-κι/

(και πλέον: https://www.academia.edu/60670307/Τροία_Τουρκία_Ελλάδα_Ψευτοϊστορία_κι_η_Αποβλάκωση_του_Μέσου_Έλληνα_από_τα_ΜΜΕ_που_προετοιμάζουν_Εθνική_Συρρίκνωση)

A K

Η Τσιλέρ παλαιότερα, δείχνοντας την Έφεσο σε ξένους διπλωμάτες είχε πει: “Είναι έργα των προγόνων μας”.

Σήμερα κάνει το ίδιο κι’ο Ερτογάν.

Μήπως θέλουν να μας πούν ότι είναι ελληνικής καταγωγής, γι’αυτό θεωρούν ότι είναι έργα των προγόνων τους;;;;

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Είχε δίκιο η Τσιλέρ.

Τα μνημεία δεν ανήκουν σε λαούς που χάνονται μέσα στην Ιστορία αλλά σε τόπους που είναι πάντα εκεί.

Έφεσος: η γνωστή από χιττιτικά κείμενα της 2 ης προχριστιανικής χιλιετίας ως Άπασα πόλη της δυτικής Ανατολίας, η ιστορία και τα μνημεία της ανήκουν στην Τουρκία, και όχι στην Ελλάδα.

Τα αρχαιοελληνικά μνημεία κι οι ναοί της Σικελίας είναι έργα των προγόνων των Ιταλών.

Επίσης, οι περισσότεροι Ρωμιοί της Ορθόδοξης Αυτοκρατορίας από το 1071 μέχρι το 1923 έγιναν μουσουλμάνοι (‘τούρκεψαν’).

Οπότε, κι απ’ αυτή την άποψη σωστά τα είπε η Τσιλέρ.

Και θα το καταλάβαιναν όλοι αυτό στην Ελλάδα, αν δεν είχε τυραννικά επιβληθεί από το ξενόδουλο κατεστημένο ένας αντιτουρκισμός κι ένα μίσος που όποιος τα έχει μέσα του δεν είναι Χριστιανός αλλά Σατανιστής.

A K

Οι πρόγονοι φανερώνουν καταγωγή, φυλή, ράτσα. Αν έχει δίκιο, τότε είναι ελληνίδα μουσουλμάνα.

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Ρωμιά μουσουλμάνα – όταν άρχισαν να καταφθάνουν τουρκικά φύλα (οι Σελτζούκοι 5000 ήταν όλοι κι όλοι – συν γυναιξί και τέκνοις), δεν υπήρχαν Έλληνες, Υπήρχαν ελληνόφωνοι Ρωμιοί κι η αυτοκρατορία ονομαζόταν Ρωμανία..

Μα αυτό είναι οι Τούρκοι κι αυτός ήταν ο εθνικισμός που συνέθεσε ως κρατικό δόγμα ο Ατατούρκ: η πολιτιστική κληρονομιά όλων των λαών της Ανατολίας (Μικρά Ασία + Καππαδοκία + Πόντος + Βόρεια Μεσοποταμία). Όχι μια ταύτιση με τους τουρκόφωνους του Καυκάσου και της Κεντρικής Ασίας.

Όποιος έχει πάει σε Ουζμπεκιστάν και Καζακστάν καταλαβαίνει ότι οι Τούρκοι δεν έχουν το σουλούπι των Κεντρασιατών.

Όσο δε για τους παντουρανιστές του Μπαχτσελί που αναφέρονται στον Ατατούρκ: κάθε που μιλάνε, γυρίζει ο Ατατούρκ μέσα στον τάφο του.

A K

Μόνο που η Έφεσος είναι Ελληνικό μνημείο, κι’όχι Ρωμαικό. Στην ‘Εφεσο αναφερόταν όταν έλεγε, ότι ήταν έργα των προγόνων της.

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Εντελώς λάθος. Σου έχουν μάθει (όχι σε σένα προσωπικά αλλά σε όλους όσους κάνετε το ίδιο λάθος) και δεν έχεις απορρίψει μια ψευδέστατη ερμηνεία της Ιστορίας.

Πριν από όλα, η Έφεσος είναι πόλη γνωστή τη 2η προχριστιανική χιλιετία από χιττιτικά κείμενα. Ήταν πρωτεύουσα του ανατολιακού κράτους Αρζάουα κι ονομαζόταν Άπασα.

Το όνομα αυτό παραφθάρηκε σε Έφεσος. Με την άφιξη των Ιώνων δημιουργήθηκε ένας μεικτός πολιτισμός, κι η Ιωνία οργανώθηκε στο Κοινό των Ιώνων όπου αργότερα προσκλήθηκε κι η αιολική αρχικά Σμύρνη.

Ιωνικός είναι ο πολιτισμός της τότε Εφέσου κι ως εκ τούτου πολύ διαφορετικός από εκείνον της δωρικής Σπάρτης. Η επονομασία Έλληνες είναι ένας φτειαχτός όρος.

Όταν έχεις διαφορετικές γλώσσες και διαφορετικούς πολιτισμούς, διαφορετικά πολιτεύματα και διαφορετικές αξίες, τότε έχει δύο ή και περισσότερους πολιτισμούς και να τους δώσεις ένα συγκεφαλαιωτικό όνομα, βοηθάει μόνο στη θολούρα.

Είναι σαν να μου λες ότι σήμερα υπάρχει ‘ευρωπαϊκός πολιτισμός’. Ψέμμα! Άλλο οι Πολωνοί κι άλλο οι Βέλγοι. ‘Άλλο οι Ούγγροι κι άλλο οι Σουηδοί, κοκ.

Τώρα, επειδή έχω πάει στην Έφεσσο κι έχω θαυμάσει τον τεράστιο αρχαιολογικό χώρο, ξέρω ότι σχεόν όλα όσα σώζονται εκεί και κυρίως η πρόσοψη της Βιβλιοθήκης του Κέλσου είναι ρωμαϊκά κι όχι ελληνικά (ή ιωνικά μνημεία).

Η Έφεσος έγινε ρωμαϊκή το 129 π.Χ.. Η Βιβλιοθήκη του Κέλσου κτίσθηκε το 117 μ.Χ. Μιλάμε για σχεδόν 250 χρόνια. Είναι η απόσταση από τον Κοσμά Αιτωλό σε μας σήμερα.

Ο Κέλσος ήταν Ρωμαίος συγκλητικός και ύπατος πιθανώτατα ιωνικής καταγωγής. Το τι ακουγόταν σαν γλώσσα γύρω από εκείνα τα κτήρια ήταν ως επί το πλείστον λατινικά. Τα ελληνικά, τα μελετούσαν (και βέβαια πολλοί ντόπιοι τα μιλούσαν αλλά ανάμεικτα με πολλές λατινικές λέξεις) αλλά αυτοί που ανήγειραν και χρησιμοποίησαν το συγκεκριμένο μνημείο ήταν Ρωμαίοι αξιωματούχοι – όχι Έλληνες.

Ο Κέλσος λεγόταν Τιβέριος Ιούλιος Κέλσος. Ξέρεις κανένα Αχαιό, Αιολό, Ίωνα ή Δωριέα που λέγεται Τιβέριος??????

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Επίσης / Διάβασε:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephesus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Celsus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiberius_Julius_Celsus_Polemaeanus

A K

Τάχω ψάξει και γώ. Τάχεις πολύ μπερδρεμένα μέσα στο μυαλό σου, κι’ούτε σύ δεν καταλαμβαίνεις τι λές.

Εκτός κι’άν είσαι ο “γνωστός”ανθέλληνας παραχαράκτης της ιστορίας, που δέν αναγνωρίζει τα έργα των προγόνων του, κι απο τους Σκοπιανόπληκτους που θέλουν να ονομαστούν τα Σκόπια,” Μακεδονία”.

Αφού η Έφεσος είναι γνωστή απο τη δεύτερη χιλιετία π.χ, πως είναι Ρωμαική; εφ’όσον όπως αναφέρεις, έγινε Ρωμαική το129 πχ;

Επομένως δεν ιδρύθηκε απο τους Ρωμαίους.

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Ποιος είναι ο “γνωστός” ανθέλληνας;

Δεν έχω μπερδεμένη την ιστορία στο μυαλό μου αλλά εσύ κι οι περισσότεροι δεν έχετε καταλάβει ότι σας έμαθαν μια ψευτοϊστορία που βολεύει μόνον τους Άγγλους, τους Γάλλους και τους Αμερικανούς για να κάνουν ένα ψευτοκράτος με μια ψεύτικη ταυτότητα όπως η Ελλάδα ό,τι θέλουν όποτε το θέλουν.

Για κάθε συμφορά που υφίσταται η χώρα ο κύριος υπαίτιος είναι το ψευτοϊστορικό δόγμα κι η διεστραμμένη ταυτότητα που ο κάθε Ρωμιός Ορθόδοξος σχηματίζει και πιστεύει ότι έχει.

Η χώρα θέλει οριστική διάλυση κι ανασύσταση. Άλλωστε, όταν λέμε ότι οι αγωνιστές του 1821 προδόθηκαν, αυτό λέμε. Το σατανοκράτος αυτό του σιωνισμού και της μασωνίας πρέπει να διαλυθεί για να σωθεί η Ρωμιοσύνη. Γιατί όσο παραμένει υπαρκτή η ψευτο-Ελλάδα τόσο προχωρεί η σιωνιστική ατζέντα της εξόντωσης του γένους μας.

Ο Μακρόν ετοιμάζει τον Τάφο της Ελλάδας και της Ευρώπης: φέρνει 200 εκ. Αφρικανούς μέσα στα επόμενα 30 χρόνια

https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2018/04/19/ο-μακρόν-ετοιμάζει-τον-τάφο-της-ελλάδα/

Μα γιατί μπερδεύεις την Ιστορία έτσι;

Άλλο ο τόπος σε μια α’ περίοδο που τότε αναφέρεται σε ιστορικά κείμενα για πρώτη φορά (χιττιτική – ανατολιακή περίοδος),

άλλο ο τόπος σε μια β’ περίοδο που αναφέρεται σε μεταγενέστερα κείμενα (ιωνική – αρχαία ελληνική περίοδος),

άλλο ο τόπος σε μια γ’ περίοδο που και αναφέρεται σε άλλα κείμενα και που από τότε σώζονται τα περισσότερα μνημεία που βρίσκονται εκεί (ρωμαϊκή περίοδος),

άλλο ο τόπος σε μια δ’ περίοδο όταν εκχριστιανίζεται κι αναφέρεται στην Αποκάλυψη (χριστιανορωμαϊκή περίοδος), κοκ.

Η Ιστορία τις περισσότερες φορές είναι μια συνέχεια και μια ανάμειξη. Λίγες φορές λόγω ολοσχερούς εξόντωσης υπάρχει διακοπή κι αλλαγή.

Βεβαίως η Έφεσος δεν ιδρύθηκε από τους Ρωμαίους. Αλλά τα εκεί σωζόμενα μνημεία είναι ρωμαϊκά. Δεν είναι ούτε χιττιτικά, ούτε ιωνικά-ελληνικά, ούτε σελτζουκικά-τουρκικά. Αλλά όλη η ιστορική κληρονομιά ενός τόπου βρίσκεται στα χέρια της σημερινής χώρας όπου ο τόπος αυτός (ο κάθε τόπος) ανήκει.

Με ένα βήμα παραπάνω λοιπόν η Τσιλέρ θα καταλάβαινε ότι οι πρόγονοί της δεν ήρθαν από τις στέππες της Κεντρικής Ασίας αλλά ήταν ντόπιοι ελληνόφωνοι Ρωμιοί Ορθόδοξοι που μια στιγμή αλλαξοπίστησαν.

Ο Αντιτουρκισμός είναι βαλτός από ντόπια όργανα Άγγλων, Γάλλων κι Αμερικανών έτσι ώστε να δημιουργήσει αλυσιδωτές αντιδράσεις και ν’ απομακρύνει τα δυο τμήματα του ίδιου γένους από την προοπτική του να επανωθούν.

Οι μισαλλόδοξοι αντι-Τούρκοι, αν δουν την καταστροφή που έφεραν στην Ρωμιοσύνη, θα αυτοκτονήσουν.

A K

Ενώ οι Τούρκοι εκτός απο γενοκτονίες, πολέμους, 400 χρόνια σκλαβιάς, σε χώρες που δεν τους ανήκαν, ήταν αγγελούδια. Ακόμα και σήμερα οι απόγονοι των Σελτζούκων παραμένουν βαρβαροι,όπως βάρβαροι είναι και οι τουρκορωμιοί απόγονοι των αρχαίων ρωμαίων.

Και παρεπιπτόντως, για ποιά ένωση μιλάς; Αυτή που προωθούν όσοι θέλουν να Τουρκέψουμε; Όσοι έχουν την επιθυμία να τεθούν υπό την αιγίδα του Ερτογάν, να πάνε στη Τουρκία, και ν’αφήσουν τους Ελληνες ήσυχους, αρκετά υπέφεραν απο τους βάρβαρους Τούρκο- μόγγολους, ισλαμιστές.

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Αυτό δεν είναι απάντηση σε τίποτα από όσα σου είπα. Κι επιπλέον είναι και λαθεμένο και μισαλλόδοξο. Αν θα είχες σπουδάσει 10 χρόνια σε πανεπιστήμια στη Γερμανία, την Αμερική, την Ρωσσία ή την Κίνα κι αν είχες ειδικευθεί σε σελτζουκικό, οθωμανικό, άλλους τουρανικούς και μογγολικό πολιτισμό, δεν θα έδειχνες τόσο αμόρφωτο χαϊβάνι!

Πρέπει να καταλάβεις ότι είσαι το θύμα αυτών που σε κυβερνούν και που σε βούλιαξαν σε μια ψευτο-ιστορία για να γίνεις του χεριού τους τόσο όσο όταν βγάζεις από το στόμα σου αυτά τα ξερατά που κάνουν σίγουρη την εξαφάνιση της Ρωμιοσύνης με τη διάλυση του ελληνικού κράτους.

Το ότι οι Τουρκορωμιοί είναι απόγονοι των αρχαίων Ρωμαίων είναι άλλη μια απόδειξη του τρομερού κόμπλεξ κατωτερότητας που νοιώθεις για την κακομοιριά στην οποία σε βούλιαξε το κατεστημένο που έκανε τη χώρα σου ένα σκουπίδι του κλώτσου και του μπάτσου.

Όσο για τις γενοκτονίες που ψευδέστατα αποδίδουν στους Τούρκους αυτοί που ξεφτιλίζουν τη σημερινλη Ελλάδα, αυτές πρέπει να ήταν τίποτα μπροστά στο τι κάναμε εμείς που είχαμε και μεγάλο αυτοκράτορα που επονομάσθηκε Βουλγαροκτόνος! Παγκόσμια πρωτοτυπία γενοκτόνων!

Έχω μια συμβουλή να σου δώσω: φτύσε τη χολέρα που άλλοι σου έχουν βάλει μέσα σου. Οδηγεί σε θάνατο. Ένας Χριστιανός στέκεται στην Αγάπη.

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Βλέπεις πόσο φοβιτσιάρη σε έχουν καταντήσει; Θλιβερό! Ποιος σου είπε ότι μου αρέσει ο Ερντογάν; Έχω γράψει επανειλημμένα εναντίον του.

Κι ακόμη χειρότερα, ποιος σου είπε ότι μια επανένωση των ελληνόφωνων Ορθοδόξων Ρωμιών με τους τουρκόφωνους Μουσουλμάνους Ρωμιούς σημαίνει ότι εμείς θα τουρκέψουμε κι όχι ότι εκείνοι θα ρωμιο-συνειδητοποιηθούν;

Και ψέμματα τα περί ισλαμιστών! Ούτε το 25% των Τούρκων δεν είναι πιστοί μουσουλμάνοι. Φανατικοί δεν πρέπει να είναι πάνω από 10%. Οι κεμαλικοί των δυτικών και νότιων παραλίων, της Σμύρνης και της Πόλης είναι πολύ κοντά μας.

Σε έχουν τυφλώσει κι όχι μόνο δεν βλέπεις αλλά και φοβάσαι από πάνω. Έτσι καταντήσανε σήμερα τον άλλοτε λεβέντη Ρωμιό. Κρίμα!

A K

Για πιό λόγο να γίνει αυτή η ένωση; για να γίνουμε “Κούρδοι”; η για να πάρουν το φυσικό αέριο της Ελλάδας και της Κύπρου;

Μια χώρα των 80.000.000 αυτή είναι που θα κάνει κουμάντο, κι’Ελλάδα θάναι μιά επαρχία της Τουρκίας, δεν χρειάζεται πολύ μυαλό, για να το καταλάβει κάποιος.

Όπως και νάχει απ’ότι φαίνεται δουλεύεις για τα συμφέροντα των τούρκων, και παριστάνεις το έλληνα. Δυστυχώς κάτι τέτοιοι σαν και σένα κατήντησαν σ’αυτό το χάλι την Ελλάδα. Δεν έχει νόημα η συνέχιση της κουβέντας μεταξύ μας.

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Εδώ δεν εκφράζεις μόνον φόβο και άγνοια αλλά και πλήρη έλλειψη φαντασίας. Και δεν υπάρχει στον άνθρωπο τίποτα ανώτερο σαν θείο δώρο από την φαντασία. Αλλά βέβαια τόσο νεκρικά είναι τα ψέμματα που επιβάλλει με τυραννικό κατεστημένο που σκοτώνουν τις ψυχές των ανθρώπων και καταντούν τα μυαλά τους κάτι σαν προγραμματισμένα ρομποτάκια ή – πιο απλά – κασέτες που επαναλαμβάνονται.

Ουσιαστικά κάνεις ένα πολύ σημαντικό ερώτημα αλλά αυτό θα το αφήσω για το τέλος.

Σου είπα εγώ να γίνουμε Κούρδοι;

Αλλά ξέρεις γιατί εσύ με ρωτάς κάτι τέτοιο;

Γιατί βαθειά μέσα στο μυαλό σου ξέρεις ότι τα τουρκικά πανεπιστήμια είναι ανώτερα από τα ελληνικά, ότι στην Τουρκία υπάρχουν πολλά ξενόγλωσσα πανεπιστήμια ενώ στην Ελλάδα κανένα, κι έτσι φοβάσαι ότι ο μέσος Έλληνας απλά θα δείξει την κατωτερότητά του μπροστά του μέσου Τούρκου. Κι αυτό είναι αλήθεια.

Αλλά αν προτείνω κάτι τέτοιο, το κάνω επειδή μια τέτοια ένωση θα είναι ταυτόχρονα αποδέσμευση κι απελεύθέρωση του μέσου Έλληνα από την πανούκλα που τον κυβερνάει και θέλει να τον ξεκάνει.

Αυτό δείχνει την αλήθεια: τα τελευταία 10 χρόνια πάνω από μισό εκατομμύριο Έλληνες, στην συντριπτική πλειοψηφία τους νέοι έφυγαν εκτός Ελλάδας και με σκοπό να μην ξαναγυρίσουν. Το 2010 φύγαμε η γυναίκα μου και γω. Τότε είχαμε ένα παιδί και τώρα έχουμε 7 και περιμένουμε το 8ο πρώτα ο Θεός.

Εκεί θα μείνουν τελικά όσοι λυμαίνονται τον τόπο, δηλαδή

α) τα καθάρματα του δημοσίου που σαν εγκληματίες κλέφτες απαιτούν να πληρώνουν οι παραγωγικοί άνθρωποι τους κηφήνες,

β) οι κομματικοί παράγοντες και

γ) τα ανώτερα στελέχη του κατεστημένου (από δημοσιογράφους και καθηγητές ψευτοπανεπιστημίων μέχρι κυπατζήδες κι άχρηστους στρατιωτικούς, κι από τους επαγελματίες πολιτικούς μέχρι τους μεγαλοεργολάβους και τους ψευτο-επιχειρηματίες των κρατικοδίαιτων.

Γιατί σ’ έκαναν να πιστεύεις όσα πιστεύεις; Για να κυβερνάνε αυτοί και να πίνουν εις υγείαν του κορόϊδου (εσένα). Εσύ δεν μπορείς ν’αντιληφθείς πόσο κοντά στον πάτο είστε;

Τα όσα πιστεύεις σε αδρανοποιούν κι αυτό ακριβώς επιδιώκουν αυτοί που θέλουν να διαλύσουν την χώρα. Γιατί μόνον 100000 αν ξυπνήσουν και ξεσηκωθούν αποφασισμένοι να κάψουν τα πάντα, οι 300 κακούργοι δεν θα προλάβουν να πάρουν το αεροπλάνο….

Εγώ να δουλεύω για την Τουρκία; Έχω τέσσερις υπηκοότητες, το σπίτι μου είναι στο Καζακστάν, η δουλειά μου σε Κένυα και Τανζανία, και διευθύνω τρεις επιχειρήσεις που έχω συνεταιρικά με Έλληνες από την Αστάνα και το Πεκίνο, με Καζάκους και Ρώσσους από το Καζακστάν, και με Κινέζους. Σκασίλα που θα είχα για να με πληρώσουν ένα ξεροκόμματο οι Τούρκοι!

Τα παιδιά μου πάνε στο γερμανικό σχολείο, ελληνικά και ρωσσικά μαθαίνουν στο σπίτι, κι οι Έλληνες συνεταίροι μου είναι τόσο σημαντικοί που θα πρέπει να πλειοδοτήσει το τουρκικό κράτος για να με πάρει (αν υποτεθεί ότι θα το ενδιέφερα κι αν τρελλαθούμε και σκεφθούμε ότι θα δεχόμουνα). Φαίνεται δεν με ξέρεις. Αυτό το βίντεο (παλιό από προηγούμενο κανάλι που έκλεισε πριν από 14 μήνες) θα σου δώσει μια ιδέα για το σε πόσες και ποιες χώρες έχω ταξιδέψει πριν φύγω στο εξωτερικό για δουλειές:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0xgJwW-F4Y

Μου λες ότι άνθρωποι σαν και μένα κατάντησαν την Ελλάδα σ’ αυτό το χάλι. Μα οι ιδέες μου, οι θέσεις μου κι οι γνώσεις μου απορρίπτονται από τα καθάρματα που κυβέρνησαν την Ελλάδα όσο εγώ έχω ζήσει (κι είμαι γεννημένος το 1956).

Αυτοί όλοι πιστεύουν αυτό που πιστεύεις και συ.

Εσύ κυβερνάς την Ελλάδα με τις απόψεις και τις θέσεις, πλην όμως το κατεστημένο σ’ έπιασε κορόιδο και παίρνει εκείνο όλο το κέρδος αφήνοντάς σε με το φόβο που σε λίγο θα γίνει πανικός όταν οι 50000+ ισλαμιστές έμπειροι πολεμιστές που βρίσκονται στην Αθήνα ξεσηκωθούν και σας σκοτώσουν για να σας ληστέψουν.

Τέλος, θα απαντήσω στην ερώτησή σου για να ικανοποιήσω την περιέργειά σου! Για ποιο λόγο να γίνει η ένωση.

Έχεις αναλογιστεί τι θα είχε συμβεί αν δεν είχε γίνει η ελληνική επανάσταση του 1821 που την υποκίνησαν Άγγλοι και Γάλλοι και που πήραν απόλυτα τον έλεγχό της ήδη πριν από το 1828 χάρη σε καθάρματα στυλ Κωλέττη και Μαυροκορδάτου, διαμορφώνοντας έτσι ένα χρεωκοπημένο κράτος γεννημένο νεκρό ουσιαστικά που δεν δίστασαν να γελοιποιήσουν το 1850 με τα γεγονότα του Πατσίφικο; Ούτως ή άλλως το νεοελληνικό κράτος ήταν άχρηστο πλέον, εφόσον ρητά τα όνειρα των αγωνιστών του 1821 προδόθηκαν – κι αυτό είναι χιλιο-ειπωμένο.

Αν δεν είχε γίνει λοιπόν η ελληνική επανάσταση, η Οθωμανική Αυτοκρατορία δεν θα είχε αποσταθεροποιηθεί, δεδομένου ότι, λαδώνοντας και διαφθείροντας ανυποψίαστους φουκαράδες εδώ και κει και πιέζοντας αποσχιστικές τάσεις σε Ελλάδα, Σερβία, Βλαχία, Αίγυπτο, Λίβανο, Άντεν και Αλγερία, οι Γάλλοι κι οι Άγγλοι προσπαθούσαν να αποδυναμώσουν το κράτος, όπου μετά τους Τούρκους οι Έλληνες ήταν η πολυπληθέστερη ομάδα στην διοίκησή του και στη διπλωματία του. Αναφορικά με την οθωμανική οικονομία του 1820, οι Έλληνες, οι Αρμένιοι, κι οι Ιουδαίοι ήταν πλουσιώτεροι κι από τους Τούρκους.

Αν δεν είχε αποσταθεροποιηθεί η Οθωμανική Αυτοκρατορία κι οι Έλληνες ήταν σ’ αυτήν ένα από τα τρία οικονομικά ισχυρώτερα έθνη το 1900, όταν θα άρχιζε η εκμετάλλευση των πετρελαίων, η χώρα δεν θα διαλυόταν και τα πετρέλαια των σημερινών Ιράκ, Κουβέϊτ, Σαουδικής Αραβίας, Κάταρ, κι Εμιράτων θα τα εκμεταλλεύονταν οι Έλληνες, οι Αρμένιοι κι οι Ιουδαίοι.

Αυτό σημαίνει ότι μια χώρα από την Αλγερία μέχρι το Ομάν κι από τη Ρουμανία με ελληνικά, τουρκικά κι αραβικά ως επίσημες γλώσσες θα εκμοντερνιζόταν τον 20ο αιώνα χάρη στα τεράστια οικονομικά της έσοδα που θα την έκαναν χωρίς υπερβολή μια από τις 2-3 μεγαλύτερες χώρες του κόσμου. Κι εννοείται ότι δεν θα υπήρχε καθόλου ισλαμική τρομοκρατία που είναι δυτικής επινόησης παρασκεύασμα.

Το μίσος κι η αρρώστεια που ψιθύρισαν οι Άγγλοι κι οι Γάλλοι στ’ αυτιά των Ελλήνων, των Αρμενίων κι άλλων πολλών εναντίον του ίδιου του κράτους τους (της Οθωμανικής Αυτοκρατορίας) ήταν μια σατανική διαστροφή που την πλήρωσαν κι οι Αρμένιοι, την πληρώσαμε και μεις που ήμασταν πολυπληθέστεροι και σε κεντρικώτερη θέση.

Αλλά την μισαλλοδοξία την τιμωρεί ο Θεός. Μισώντας αντί να αγαπάς τον πλησίον σου, γίνεσαι σατανιστής και παύεις να είσαι Χριστιανός.

Έτσι τώρα, είτε σ’ αρέσει είτε όχι, θα πέσει άσχημο τσεκούρι στην Ελλάδα γιατί εδώ πληρώνονται όλα. Η σατανοχώρα που επιτρέπει σε πούστηδες και πλακομούνες να σκοτώνουν τις ψυχές μικρών παιδιών, υιοθετώντας τα, είναι ένα σατανικό αίσχος προ της Τουρκίας (που και βέβαια δεν είναι αγία χώρα – κάθε άλλο!!).

Αντί λοιπόν να επιμένεις στο σκοτεινό αδιέξοδο όπου σε οδήγησαν οι τοποτηρητές των εχθρών του γένους μας, δες την αλήθεια κι η αλήθεια θα σ’ ελευθερώσει.

sakis skoularikis

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Συμφωνω φιλε μου. Εχω εκφραστει κι εγω ετσι, οπως εσυ περιπου, και εχω εισπραξει απο φιλους Ελληνες, μια τεραστια εντυπωση φοβικων τασεων απο μερους τους. Αυτοι που “κινουν νηματα” στην Ελλαδα, εχουν κανει καλη δουλεια. Αυτο που εγραψες, περι ρωμιο-συνειδητοποιησης, δεν το καταλαβαινουν με τιποτα. Σε κουβεντες μου, εχω προσπαθησει να τους το κανω “λιανα”, αλλα και παλι οι παρωπίδες τους, δεν τους αφηνουν να δουν τιποτα.

Συνεχισε να προσπαθεις!!!

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Φχαριστώ για τα καλά σου λόγια και την παρότρυνση! Νάσαι πάντα καλά!

Φίλε μου, έχουμε δουλειές με φούντες μπροστά μας, και μια και βλέπω ότι είσαι από την Ηλεία, πρέπει να καθαρίσουμε την …… Κόπρο του Αυγείου (!!) που πληρωμένοι πράκτορες της Φραγκιάς και της Μασωνίας, της Αμερικής και του Σιωνισμού έβαλαν σιγά-σιγά και για δυο αιώνες στα μυαλά πολλών διαδοχικών γενεών. Και δυστυχώς δεν είμαστε ο Ηρακλής!

Αλλά πιστεύω ότι η Θεία Πρόνοια έχει από καιρό επιλέξει το γένος μας για κάτι μεγάλο (και μέχρι τώρα ήμασταν πολύ μικροί) κι ένας Άνθρωπος μόνος θα έρθει και θα φέρει την ανατροπή. Αλλά δεν θα είναι ούτε με συνηθισμένο υλι(στι)κό τρόπο, ούτε χωρίς αίμα.

Καλημέρα από Ναϊρόμπι – Κένυα

Νίκος – raktn@inbox.ru

Δανιήλ & Ιησούς ορίζουν ότι στο Πλήρωμα του Χρόνου ο “Υιός του Ανθρώπου” είναι “ο Άρχων των Ελλήνων” και θα εξοντώσει το Ισραήλ

https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2017/11/09/δανιήλ-ιησούς-ορίζουν-ότι-στο-πλήρωμ/

sakis skoularikis Α Κ

Εχεις πολυ φοβο μεσα σου φιλε μου. Μπορει καποιος να σε κανει “Κουρδο”, αν εσυ δεν το θελεις;

Φοβασαι μηπως εισαι ευαλωτος σε τετοιο σημειο, ή το ξερεις οτι εισαι; Φιλε μου δεν στα λεω για να σε προσβαλω. Προσπαθω να σου δειξω οτι δεν πρεπει να φοβασαι. Οσο για το “κουμαντο” που λες, να σαι σιγουρος οτι κουμαντο παντα κανει, αυτος που εχει μυαλο. Ποτε τα 80.000.000.

Παρεμπιπτόντως, ειμαι απο Πυργο Ηλειας και δεν εχω γνωρισε ποτε μου Τουρκο, για να μη λες ή νομιζεις.

Mikhail Kutuzov in 1812, Sergei Shoigu in 2024, and Aleksey Kivshenko's Historical Painting of the Military Council in Fili, a suburb of Moscow

Many Russians were astounded yesterday morning, when reading in the news that during searches conducted in the residences of the former Deputy Minister of Defense of Russia Dmitry Bulgakov, who was arrested on charges of corruption on 26th of July, a small number of very bizarre frames and paintings were found.

The historically true: Commander-in-Chief of the Russian armies Mikhail Kutuzov at 'the Council in Fili', 1812

The mystically allegorical: Sergei Shoigu, former Minister of Defense of Russia and currently Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation as an atemporal replica of General Kutuzov

Contents

I. Introduction

II. Brief description and possible parallels

III. Shoigu's lengthy tenure exceeded by far that of President Putin

IV. Long 'reigns' come with indulgence in corruption and extravagance

V. An attempt to inculpate or a mystical allegory?

VI. Appendices

Содержание

I. Введение

II. Краткое описание и возможные параллели

III. Длительное правление Шойгу намного превзошло президентство президента Путина

IV. Длительное «правление» сопровождается потворством коррупции и расточительству

V. Попытка инкриминировать или мистическая аллегория?

VI. Приложения

I. Introduction

The most mysterious of those paintings is based on a historical painting, which was created by the famous 19th c. Russian painter Aleksey Kivshenko (1851-1895) in 1879, and known as 'the Council in Fili'. This great masterpiece of Modern Russian Art represents the artist's impression of a historical event, namely a military council that took place (1812) in a suburb of Moscow, prior to Napoleon's temporary occupation of the Russian city (14 September – 19 October 1812). The extraordinary summit occurred immediately after the Battle of Borodino, which was a Pyrrhic victory for the French army.

Created 67 years after the event, the painting had an enormous success; Kivshenko, who was already known for his numerous, fascinating works and representations of significant historical events of the Russian past, had to repeat the painting twice, which clearly means that his artwork generated an overwhelming and exceptional enthusiasm. This situation was basically due to the primordial importance of the historical event.

The Commander-in-Chief of the Russian armies, Infantry General Mikhail Golenishchev-Kutuzov had then to take a most critical decision: the orderly retreat of the Russian army from Moscow. The meeting (13 September 1812), which is known through several historical sources, started with the dilemma formulated by General Leonty Bennigsen, namely to give battle against the French army in an unfavorable position or to surrender. Kutuzov sided finally with the minority opinion and took the decision to abandon Moscow, which was finally proven correct, because Napoleon could not hold his position for long.

Then, how should we today, 212 years after the event and 145 years after the painting, interpret a bizarre painting in which a group of top Russian statesmen and military desire to be and are effectively depicted as exchanging roles with the historical personalities who saved the Russian Empire before two centuries?

In the painting found in Bulgakov's house, Sergei Shoigu, the former Minister of Defense of Russia, and now Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, is depicted as the Russian commander Mikhail Kutuzov. Shoigu's former deputy Ruslan Tsalikov plays General Mikhail Barclay de Tolly. The painting also features former deputy defense ministers Timur Ivanov, Tatyana Shevtsova and other officials.

Several other bizarre paintings were found in the arrested statesman's house, but the atemporal replica of the said historical painting raises more questions, due to the potential symbolisms or parallels that can be drawn. If the potentially allegorical but effectively incomprehensible artwork was found in 2005 or in 2012, no one would pay much attention, and the eventually innocuous representation would be taken as the result of a certainly bold, yet counterproductive, imagination of a group of top level Russian officials, eventually characterized by their narcissism.

It is clear that many Russians are -truly speaking- under terrible shock because of the revelations, and their comments about this, most weird, story are very negative. With no doubt, Kutuzov is almost a holy person for the Russians because, although he did not mark a real victory over Napoleon, he forced him to advance following Pyrrhic victories during a prolonged war of attrition which led finally to the collapse of the French Army. How a defeat at the battlefield can possibly be transformed into a victory in the long perspective is a most fatalistic turn of events for historians to possibly fathom. But it was known since the time of the Battle of Kadesh (May 1274 BCE) between the Hittite Emperor Muwatalli II and the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramesses III.

On the other hand, many of the persons depicted on the bizarre paintings have recently lost their positions or even been arrested. Bulgakov was arrested only 4-5 days ago, following allegations of bribery, but he is only the last of several similar cases.

II. Brief description and existing parallels

As the mystery of these eventually absurd but potentially meaningful pictures is beyond imagination, several friends contacted me to make some inquiries. They asked me what this meant in reality and whether this initiatory and hypothetically purposeful painting denoted a hidden desire of Shoigu to "take Putin's place".

What follows here includes parts of my responses; it is actually difficult to answer such a question because there are many parameters involved in this regard; but in general, I never thought that Sergei Shoigu would be interested in taking Putin's place. In addition, the painting does not hint at anything of the sort. Kutuzov did not imagine, even for a second, not to be loyal to the Russian czars whom he served.

First and foremost, it is essential for any non-Russian to comprehend that Russians have no conventional thought. Historically, it is very common in Russia to evaluate one man as higher and as more important than the czar, the secretary general or the president.

If one goes to Russia and speaks with the average people, one will understand that what they narrate as «History of Russia» is not what is taught in the West about this topic. By this, I don't mean discrepancies at the level of historical facts and narratives, but a totally distinct perspective of the time and a markedly different evaluation of the human deeds.

There are effectively some parallels between Kutuzov (1745-1813) and Shoigu (born in 1955).

Kutuzov served (as military officer and diplomat) three czars (Catherine II, Paul I, and Alexander I).

And Shoigu was a minister under four presidents (Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin, and Medvedev). 

Prince Mikhail Illarionovich Golenishchev-Kutuzov-Smolensky (Михаил Илларионович Голенищев-Кутузов-Смоленский) belonged to an ancient noble family of German-Prussian extraction. The Golenishchev-Kutuzov branch consisted of the descendants of Gabriel, who left Prussia (1252-1263) and became the founder of the Kutuzovs.

Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu (Сергей Кужугетович Шойгу) belonged to a Turkic Tuvan family, as his father (Kuzhuget Shoigu, 1921-2010) was first Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, and a deputy of the Supreme Soviet of the Tuvan ASSR. Shoigu's mother (Alexandra Yakovlevna Shoigu, 1924–2011) was a Ukrainian-born Russian, who was detained by the German occupation forces during World War II and had a traumatic experience from this event.

en.wikipedia.org

Kuzhuget Shoigu - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Tuvans - Wikipedia

Mikhail Kutuzov was a multilingual, as he was fluent in Russian, German, French and English; on later occasions he also studied Ottoman Turkish, Polish, and Swedish.

Sergei Shoigu is also a multilingual, who speaks Tuvan, Russian, and another seven languages including Chinese, Japanese, Turkish, English, etc.

III. Shoigu's lengthy tenure exceeded by far that of President Putin

All the people know that Vladimir Putin has been president since the year 2000 (with an interval of four years (2008-2012), when he served as prime minister; however, few people remember today that Shoigu was a minister since 1991. Only last May, he was removed from the position of Minister of Defense and promoted/rewarded as «Secretary of the Security Council of Russia».

This means that Shoigu was a minister for 33 years! When the positions are so important, a person creates his own small state within the state; this is normal and inevitable.

As a matter of fact, Yeltsin appointed Shoigu as Minister of Emergency Situations in April 1991. All the same, at the time, Yeltsin was only the «President of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic», not the «President of the Russian Federation». This means that Yeltsin was under Gorbachev who was then the «President of the Soviet Union». In other words, Shoigu was at the very beginning a minister of USSR, not Russia! He was appointed before the August 1991 coup attempt, which failed and led to the rise of Yeltsin, resignation of Gorbachev, and demise of the USSR. 

en.wikipedia.org

Sergei Shoigu - Wikipedia

And what was Vladimir Putin at the time?

In June 1991, in (then) Leningrad, he was appointed as head of the Committee for External Relations of the Mayor's Office. So, you cannot compare. 

en.wikipedia.org

Vladimir Putin - Wikipedia

In fact, better than any other Russian, Sergei Shoigu epitomizes the transition from the USSR to today's Russia. Consequently, although he was not a career military man but an apparatchik and part of the Soviet nomenklatura, he had progressively become a major pole of power. And because of his success, which guaranteed Putin’s success, it was surely unthinkable for anyone to remove him. 

However, the uneasiness of the Russians with the ongoing fake war in Ukraine and the disclosure of several financial scandals and cases of bribery in the Russian army and the Ministry of Defense generated another environment.

IV. Long 'reigns' come with indulgence in corruption and extravagance

Last April, the Russian deputy defense minister Timur Ivanov was arrested. 

The Moscow Times

Arrested Russian Deputy Defense Minister Accused of Accepting $12 Mln Bribe, Lawyer Says - The Moscow Times

Russian Deputy Defense Minister Timur Ivanov has been accused of accepting a bribe “in the form of services” valued at more than 1 billion r

This occurred only little time after Putin’s re-election. 

One month after the arrest, Sergei Shoigu was removed and replaced by Andrey Belousov, who is provenly a very good economist, a well-experienced statesman, and a former First Deputy Prime Minister of Russia.

en.wikipedia.org

Andrey Belousov - Wikipedia

At the time, many people said that Putin placed an economist at the top of the Ministry of Defense, because he wanted to make a more effective programming of the military industrial production in view of the continuation of the war in Ukraine. It may be.

But personally, I was absolutely convinced that the reason for this appointment was the desire to effectuate an extensive control of earlier business transactions, carry out a thorough examination of past deals, identify practices of corruption, and uncover all cases of bribery that the «Shoigu establishment» allowed or tolerated or supported or covered deliberately. In the face of the collateral damages caused by the Russian military operations in Ukraine, it would be unacceptable that top officials accumulated illegal benefits. 

Almost four months after the aforementioned case of Timur Ivanov, the arrest of Bulgakov rang the bell for the part of the Russian establishment that was exposed to such inexcusable weaknesses at wartime and for ministers who indulged themselves in corruption and extravagance.

en.wikipedia.org

Dmitry Bulgakov - Wikipedia

and

The Moscow Times

Former Russian Deputy Defense Minister Arrested on Corruption Charges - The Moscow Times

Former Deputy Defense Minister Dmitry Bulgakov has been arrested on corruption charges, Russian law enforcement authorities announced on Fri

And with the frames and paintings found in his house yesterday, we learned that Bulgakov viewed Shoigu as Kutuzov!

Of course, Kutuzov is more important than Alexander I for the Russians. Czar Alexander I acknowledged personally that Russia owed the final victory to Kutuzov. This means that, with all similarities taken together as coincidental (!!), Bulgakov and his associates, friends and subordinates viewed Shoigu like a 'god'. Several Russian friends interpret this approach as absolutely true; they even consider it as the result of extreme narcissism of all persons involved. 

What follows is a selection of comments that I found in Russian social media (I translated them into English):

1. «This is blasphemy against the memory and exploits of our ancestors»!

2. «They came up with this a long time ago and are successfully stealing it»

3. «A finished script for a film. How far human stupidity and impudence go»!

4. «They are very far from Kutuzov and others; but there is plenty of time for self-admiration»

5. «A gang of thieves assembled»

6. «Where is Timur Ivanov»?

From the following web pages:

А такие портреты нашли дома у задержанного экс-замминистра обороны Дмитрия Булгакова во время обысков.

and

Минутка статистики по одному из шедевров золотой коллекции задержанного замминистра обороны Булгакова.

V. An attempt to inculpate or a mystical allegory?

As a matter of fact, it would not make sense for Shoigu and his close associates to envision that he would take Putin’s place (let alone to conspire with this target in mind); in addition, the picture says the opposite. Kutuzov was already more important than the czar.

All the same, there is another dimension too; these pictures may have been placed in Bulgakov's home after his arrest in order to inculpate him, Shoigu and others in some way. This would however seem rather to be a puerile attempt, because there can be far worse and far more effective ways to inculpate someone than the revelation of the narcissistic visions and the grandiose imaginations of a group of corrupt and not corrupt officials.

If there is a symbolism, it means that the true ruler is («was»?) Shoigu; but even in this case, it is a very unusual type of praising and self-praising for some top officials. In real terms of boastfulness, such an atemporal replica of Aleksey Kivshenko's legendary painting adds nothing on the table.

I believe that, if some people want truly to unveil a real and serious purpose in this painting, they must rather view it as a mystical allegory – not a mere symbolism. In this case, the otherwise bizarre artwork becomes meaningful.

What are the major points of an allegorical mysticism in this regard?

I will brief enumerate a few.

1- Reminiscent of the French invasion of the Russian Empire, the present war in Ukraine reveals that the Russian Federation is under attack.

It matters little whether some Western idiots believe that we have to deal with a Russian invasion of Ukraine; there was never such an event, because Ukraine is an integral part of Russian territory that criminal Anglo-Saxon gangsters brutally and illegally detached from Russia at the time of the Soviet collapse.

Yuval Harari was very correct when saying that "Gorbachev saved us from nuclear war"; but his truth ends there. What truly happened in 1989 is not the continuation of a development that started in 1985. In fact, Gorbachev was openly threatened by George Herbert Bush with imminent nuclear attack if he did not rapidly dissolve the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact. The truth was enveloped in thousands of lies, endless smiles, and hypocritical hand shakings, because this was beneficial for both, the US and the Soviet Union/Russia. I cannot further expand now on this topic, because I would digress.

So, as it happened in the 1810s and the 1940s, Russia has been under attack since the late 1980s.

2- Similarly with Kutuzov's ingenious strategy and tactics, the Russian state withdrew from lands for quite some time now.

The formation of the Ukrainian pseudo-nation after 1991 was an entirely orchestrated fabrication, involving the creation of a bogus-idiom named 'Ukrainian language', the pseudo-translation of thousands of toponyms and personal names into their hypothetically Ukrainian forms, the compilation of a distorted 'History of Ukraine', the diffusion of heinous anti-Russian racism, and the subtle disfigurement of the Orthodox faith of the local population into a charlatanesque form of Anti-Christian Catholicism.

3- Similarly with what happened during the French Invasion of the Russian Empire, the military proved to be the backbone of the Russian nation.

In this regard, the lengthy tenure of Sergei Shoigu reflects perfectly well the long military career of Mikhail Kutuzov.

4- The partly withdrawal from the Western Russian lands, as implemented by the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian armies, can be mirrored in Moscow's agreement for a separate, 'independent' Ukrainian state. The concession made is very similar to the decision taken at the Military Council in Fili.

5- Sergei Shoigu's contribution to the final victory may be analogous to Kutuzov's strategy which brought the final victory after many rather insignificant defeats.

6- Last but foremost, the final defeat of Napoleon in Russia ended with the subsequent demise of his regime; the allegory is very clear as regards the combined Anglo-Saxon world that has attacked USSR-Russia since 1945 – or if you prefer 1985.

---------------------------

Download the article in PDF:

Patreon

Mikhail Kutuzov in 1812, Sergei Shoigu in 2024, and Aleksey Kivshenko's Historical Painting of the Military Council in Fili, a suburb of Mos

Get more from Megalommatis on Patreon

PROOF THAT AFRICANS WERE IN AMERICA BEFORE COLUMBUS!

Columbus Himself

According to renowned American historian and linguist Leo Weiner of Harvard University, one of the strongest pieces of evidence to support the fact that African people sailed to America before Christopher Columbus was a journal entry from Columbus himself. In Weiner’s book, “Africa and the Discovery of America,” he explains that Columbus noted in his journal that the Native Americans confirmed “dark brown” people had come from the south-east in boats, trading in gold-tipped spears.”

American Narcotics Discovered in Egyptian Mummies

The discovery of American narcotics in Egyptian mummies has left some historians amazed. Recently, archaeologists discovered the presence of narcotics only known to be derived from American plants in ancient Egyptian mummies. These substances included South American cocaine from Erythroxylon and nicotine from Nicotiana tabacum. German toxicologist Svetla Balabanova reported the findings, which suggest that such compounds made their way to Africa through trans-Atlantic trade that would predate Columbus’ arrival by thousands of years.

North America

For years, Eurocentric archaeologists have largely turned the other cheek when it came to the discovery of artifacts from ancient Egypt being discovered in the Americas. According to Dr. David Imhotep, the author behind the book “The First Americans Were Africans: Documented Evidence,” “Egyptian artifacts found across North America from the Algonquin writings on the East Coast to the artifacts and Egyptian place names in the Grand Canyon” are all signs of an early arrival in the Americas by Africans. This is also paired with a much earlier account of African people with incredible skills at sea. Back in 445 B.C., the Greek historian Herodotus wrote of King Ramses III leading a team of Africans at sea with astounding seafaring and navigational skills. Together, both accounts would point to Africans sailing over to the New World before Columbus.

Ancient Pyramids

Constructing pyramids was a highly specialized and complicated task that took the ancient Egyptians a lot of time to master. In ancient Egypt, there are signs of progression from the original stepped pyramid of Djoser to the more sophisticated pyramids that now stand at Giza. According to historians, it would be impossible for any group of people to have built those same complex pyramids without going through the same progression. Professor Everett Borders noted the presence of completed pyramids in La Venta in Mexico but the unusual absence of any earlier forms of the pyramids. According to Borders, it’s a sign that Africans, having already mastered the construction of pyramids in Egypt, sailed over to the New World and constructed these dual-purpose tombs and temples in the Americas.

Ancient African Skeletons Discovered in the New World

There have been many instances of archaeologists discovering skulls and skeletons that they believed clearly belonged to people of African descent. Polish professor Andrzej Wiercinski revealed the discovery of African skulls at Olmec sites in Tlatilco, Cerro de las Mesas and Monte Alban. Even more ancient African skeletons that would clearly predate Columbus’ arrival in the Americas were discovered throughout Central America and South America with some even being unearthed in what is now California.

A Clear Link in Religion

The similarities in Native American and African religions also suggest that Africans had to have had early contact with the Native Americans by sailing to the New World. Before Columbus stumbled upon the Native Americans’ land, there were prominent figures of deities with dark skin and coarse hair throughout their religion. Today, many surviving portraits reveal these deities who were clearly crafted in the likeness of Africans. Historians also point to wall paintings in caves in South America that depict the ancient Egyptian “opening of the mouth” and cross libation rituals.

The Accounts of Other European Explorers

Christopher Columbus wasn’t the only European explorer who made note of an African presence in the Americas upon his arrival. Historians revealed that at least a dozen other explorers, including Vasco Nunez de Balboa, also made record of seeing “Negroes” when they reached the New World. The accounts match up with the reports from the natives in Mexico. Nicholas Leon, an eminent Mexican authority, recorded the oral traditions of his people and ultimately kept track of a key piece of evidence that African people made it to the New World far before their European counterparts. His reports revealed accounts from natives saying “the oldest inhabitants of Mexico were African. [T]he existence of Africans and giants is commonly believed by nearly all the races of our sail and in their various language they had words to designate them.”

Africans Were Master Shipbuilders

Some people insist that Africans couldn’t have made it to the New World first simply because they didn’t have the skill and resources to sail across the Atlantic. As it turns out, that’s completely false. Historians have discovered evidence that suggests Africans were masters at building ships and that it was actually a part of their tradition. Shipbuilding and sailing are over 20,000 years old in the Sahara, and cave wall paintings of ancient ships were displayed in National Geographic magazine years ago. With those shipbuilding skills and the navigation skills that were noted by other historians of the time, the myth that Africans wouldn’t have been able to sail to the New World becomes officially debunked. As Dr. Julian Whitewright, a maritime archaeologist at the University of Southampton, explained, the voyage from Africa on ancient ships was “quite a plausible undertaking, based on the capabilities of the vessel of the period and historical material stating it took place.”

Gigantic Stone Heads in Central Mexico

The Olmec civilization was the first significant civilization in Mesoamerica and deemed “Mother Culture of Mexico” by some historians. This civilization dominated by Africans is best known for the colossal carved heads in Central Mexico that serve as even more evidence that Africans sailed to the New World before Columbus. The heads are clearly crafted in the likeness of Africans. The same civilization that created these giant heads was also responsible for introducing written language, arts, sophisticated astronomy and mathematics to Mesoamerican civilization, ancient African historian Professor Van Sertima explained.

A Long History of Trade by Sea

According to Paul Alfred Barton, the author of “A History of the African-Olmecs: African Civilizations of America from Prehistoric Times to the Present Era,” ancient kingdoms in West Africa have a long history of trade by sail, which made it all the more likely that they eventually expanded their trade to the Americas. While the Sahara is a dry desert today, its past as a lake-filled, wet and fertile place has been well-documented. African ships often crossed these large lakes to get from place to place and traded with other African civilizations along the way. After expanding their trade to the Americas, they certainly made their mark as things like African native cotton were soon being discovered all across North America.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu0z6zyc2J8

A satirical papyrus showing a lady mouse being served wine by a cat while another cat dresses her hair, a third cares for her baby, and a fourth fans her. The mice have hilarious huge, round ears.

Where: Egyptian Museum Cairo

When: New Kingdom